首页> 外文期刊>Microbiologia Medica >Comparative analisys in cultural test of biological fluids: routine Vs a new strumentation (Alifax HB&L Uroquattro)
【24h】

Comparative analisys in cultural test of biological fluids: routine Vs a new strumentation (Alifax HB&L Uroquattro)

机译:生物液体培养测试中的比较分析:常规Vs新仪器(Halifax HB&L Ur Quattro)

获取原文
           

摘要

The accuracy and rapidity of a microbiological diagnosis is crucial for the proper management of critical or neutropenic patients.To reduce the time of analysis, we compared the performances of an automated system with those of the conventional method (direct coltural analysis in agar medium BD and a enrichement for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and fungi in BD bactec bottles). For this study, we evaluated the kind of specimens, the time of analysis and the positivity for several bacterial strains. Finally we compared the specificity and sensitivity of the automated system with those of the traditional coltures. A total of 50 specimens were analysed.All the specimens were from patiens hospitalized in the wards of Perugia’s hospital.We found that the results obtained with the Alìfax system differed from those of conventional/coltural method.We propose to utilize the Alìfax system for coltural analysis of urine where the cut off of signifìcativity is 50 cfu/mL and the infectious agent involved is often monomicrobic and aerobic.We will continue to use the arrichment of fluid in BD bottles which is very accurate.
机译:微生物学诊断的准确性和快速性对关键或中性粒细胞减少症患者的正确管理至关重要。为了减少分析时间,我们将自动化系统的性能与常规方法(在琼脂培养基BD和BD bactec瓶中有氧和厌氧细菌和真菌的浓缩)。在这项研究中,我们评估了标本的种类,分析时间以及几种细菌菌株的阳性率。最后,我们将自动化系统与传统方法的特异性和敏感性进行了比较。共分析了50个标本,所有标本均来自佩鲁贾医院病房住院的患者,我们发现Alìfax系统获得的结果与传统/人工方法不同,我们建议使用Alìfax系统进行人工结肠分析的尿液中,截断的显着性是50 cfu / mL,涉及的传染因子通常是单微生物和好氧的。我们将继续使用非常准确的BD瓶中的液体填充方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号