首页> 外文期刊>Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz >Specific antigen serologic tests in leprosy: implications for epidemiological surveillance of leprosy cases and household contacts
【24h】

Specific antigen serologic tests in leprosy: implications for epidemiological surveillance of leprosy cases and household contacts

机译:麻风病的特异性抗原血清学检测:对麻风病和家庭接触者的流行病学监测的意义

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND There is a lack of straightforward tests for field application and known biomarkers for predicting leprosy progression in infected individuals. OBJECTIVE The aim was to analyse the response to infection by Mycobacterium leprae based on the reactivity of specific antigens: natural disaccharide linked to human serum albumin via an octyl (NDOHSA), a semisynthetic phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I); Leprosy Infectious Disease Research Institute Diagnostic-1 (LID-1) and natural disaccharide octyl - Leprosy Infectious Disease Research Institute Diagnostic-1 (NDOLID). METHODS The study population consisted of 130 leprosy cases diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 and 277 household contacts. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to analyse the reactivity of antibodies against NDOHSA, LID-1 and NDOLID. The samples and controls were tested in duplicate, and the antibody titer was expressed as an ELISA index. Data collection was made by home visits with application of questionnaire and dermatological evaluation of all household contacts to identify signs and symptoms of leprosy. FINDINGS Significant differences in the median ELISA results were observed among leprosy cases in treatment, leprosy cases that had completed treatment and household contacts. Higher proportions of seropositivity were observed in leprosy cases in treatment. Seropositivity was also higher in multibacillary in relation to paucibacillary, with the difference reaching statistical significance. Lower titers were observed among cases with a longer treatment time or discharge. For household contacts, the differences according to the clinical characteristics of the leprosy index case were less pronounced than expected. Other factors, such as the endemicity of leprosy, exposure outside the residence and genetic characteristics, appeared to have a greater influence on the seropositivity. MAIN CONCLUSIONS Serologic tests could be used as auxiliary tools for determining the operational classification, in addition to identifying infected individuals and as a strategy for surveillance of household contacts.
机译:背景技术缺乏用于现场应用的直接测试和用于预测感染个体中麻风病进展的已知生物标志物。目的基于特定抗原的反应性,分析麻风分枝杆菌对感染的反应:天然二糖通过辛基(NDOHSA)与人血清白蛋白连接,半合成酚醛糖脂-I(PGL-1);麻风传染病研究所Diagnostic-1(LID-1)和天然二糖辛基-麻风传染病研究所Diagnostic-1(NDOLID)。方法该研究人群包括2010年至2015年期间诊断的130例麻风病病例和277例家庭接触者。酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)用于分析针对NDOHSA,LID-1和NDOLID的抗体的反应性。一式两份地测试样品和对照,并且抗体效价表示为ELISA指数。通过家庭访问收集数据,应用问卷调查和对所有家庭接触者的皮肤病学评估,以鉴定麻风的症状和体征。结果在治疗的麻风病病例,已完成治疗的麻风病病例和家庭接触的麻风病病例中,中位ELISA结果存在显着差异。在治疗的麻风病患者中观察到更高比例的血清阳性。多菌落中的阳性阳性率也高于脓杆菌,差异达到统计学意义。在治疗时间或出院时间较长的病例中,滴度较低。对于家庭接触者,麻风指数病例的临床特征差异不如预期的明显。其他因素,例如麻风病的流行,在住所外的接触和遗传特征,似乎对血清阳性具有更大的影响。主要结论血清学检查除了可以识别感染者之外,还可以用作确定操作分类的辅助工具,并可以作为监视家庭接触者的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号