首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Safety and efficacy of semiextended field intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: An observational study of 10-year experience
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of semiextended field intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: An observational study of 10-year experience

机译:半扩展场强度调制放射疗法和顺铂同时治疗对局部晚期宫颈癌患者的安全性和有效性:10年经验的观察性研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) are at risk of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis. Pelvic concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the current standard treatment for LACC, has a PALN failure rate of 9% according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 90–01, suggesting that it may not completely eliminate all microscopic tumors in the PALNs. To minimize the toxicities associated with conventional prophylactic extended-field radiotherapy, our institute use prophylactic semiextended field radiotherapy that includes only the PALNs below the level of the renal vessels. Use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is another means of reducing the incidence of toxicity. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of prophylactic semiextended field IMRT (SEF-IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with LACC. We retrospectively assessed survival and toxicity in 76 patients with stage IB2–IVA cervical cancer and negative PALNs who received prophylactic SEF-IMRT and concurrent weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) between 2004 and 2013. The region targeted by SEF-IMRT included the PALNs below the level of the renal vessels, and the prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Brachytherapy was administered at a dose of 30 Gy in 6 fractions. Survival outcomes were calculated by using the Kaplan–Meier method, and acute and late toxicities were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. All patients completed the planned SEF-IMRT, as well as brachytherapy. Acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematologic toxicities were observed in 2, 0, and 41 patients, respectively. The median follow-up time after SEF-IMRT was 55 (range, 11–124) months. Eight patients developed out-field distant recurrences without PALN failure, and 1 patient experienced out-field PALN failure with simultaneous distant metastasis. No patients had late genitourinary toxicities, and 3 patients had late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicities. The 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, local failure-free survival, regional failure-free survival, PALN failure-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 85.0%, 84.4%, 96.0%, 97.3%, 98.6%, and 88.4%, respectively. For patients with LACC, prophylactic PALN irradiation up to the level of the renal vessels reduced PALN recurrence and resulted in favorable outcomes with few severe toxicities.
机译:患有局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)的患者有主动脉旁淋巴结转移(PALN)的风险。盆腔同步放化疗是目前LACC的标准治疗方法,根据放射治疗肿瘤学小组90–01试验,PALN失败率为9%,这表明它可能无法完全消除PALN中的所有微观肿瘤。为了使与常规预防性扩展视野放射疗法相关的毒性最小化,我们研究所使用了预防性半扩展性辐射放射疗法,其中仅包括肾血管水平以下的PALN。使用调强放疗(IMRT)是减少毒性发生率的另一种方法。这项研究评估了LACC患者的半预防性野外IMRT(SEF-IMRT)和顺铂同步化疗的安全性和有效性。我们回顾性评估了接受预防性SEF-IMRT和每周一次顺铂(40 mg / m 2)。SEF-IMRT的目标区域包括低于肾血管水平的PALN,规定剂量为28个组分中的50.4 Gy。近距离放射治疗以30 Gy的剂量分6次给药。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算生存结果,并根据《不良事件通用术语标准》 3.0版对急性和晚期毒性进行评分。所有患者均完成了计划的SEF-IMRT以及近距离治疗。分别在2、0和41例患者中观察到急性,≥3级胃肠道,泌尿生殖道和血液学毒性。 SEF-IMRT后的中位随访时间为55(11-124)个月。 8例患者发生了远距离远距离复发而没有PALN失败,而1例患者出现了远距离PALN失败并同时发生远处转移。没有患者有泌尿生殖道晚期毒性,有3名患者有3级胃肠道毒性晚期。 5年总生存期,无疾病生存期,局部无故障生存期,区域无故障生存期,PALN无故障生存期和远处无转移生存率分别为85.0%,84.4%,96.0%,97.3%,分别为98.6%和88.4%。对于LACC患者,预防性PALN照射至肾血管水平可减少PALN复发,并产生良好的预后,且几乎没有严重的毒性反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号