首页> 外文期刊>Medycyna Pracy >Reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Berlin Questionnairefor screening obstructive sleep apnea syndromein the context of the examination of candidates for drivers
【24h】

Reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Berlin Questionnairefor screening obstructive sleep apnea syndromein the context of the examination of candidates for drivers

机译:Epworth嗜睡量表和柏林问卷的可靠性在检查驾驶员候选人的背景下筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合症

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The aim of the study has been to assess the usefulness of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Berlin Questionnaire(BQ) for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) screening. The capacity of both tests to discriminate between healthyindividuals or with mild OSAS (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 15/h) vs. patients with moderate or severe OSAS (AHI ≥ 15/h)was evaluated. Material and Methods: The study encompassed 223 patients with a suspicion of the OSAS. The ESS and BQ werecompleted by patients unassisted. Screening polysomnography was performed using the Porti SleepDoc. The OSAS was diagnosedwhen AHI ≥ 15/h or AHI ≥ 5/h with simultaneous occurrence of clinical symptoms. Results: The ESS score was found to be significantlyhigher in the study group compared to the control group (8.9±5.9 vs. 11.6±5.2 pt, p 0.0001). Otherwise, there wereno significant inter-group differences in the percentage of high-risk individuals according to the BQ (83.7% vs. 92.3%, p 0.05).Sensitivity of the ESS and BQ was 53.2% and 93.1%, respectively while specificity was 58.8% and 16.2%, respectively. Poor correlationbetween the ESS score and AHI and apnea index were noticed (r = 0.22, p = 0.001 and r = 0.24, p 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Considering its low sensitivity, the ESS should not be used as a screening test for the OSAS diagnosis amongstcandidates for drivers. The BQ is characterised by high sensitivity for the OSAS diagnosis with AHI ≥ 15/h, however, due tolow specificity, the questionnaire may increase the number of healthy individuals referred for needless diagnostic procedures.Med Pr 2016;67(6):721–728
机译:背景:本研究的目的是评估Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)和柏林问卷(BQ)对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合症(OSAS)筛查的有效性。评估了两种测试区分健康个体或轻度OSAS(呼吸暂停-呼吸不足指数(AHI)<15 / h)与中度或重度OSAS(AHI≥15 / h)患者的能力。材料和方法:该研究纳入了223名怀疑患有OSAS的患者。 ESS和BQ由无助的患者完成。使用Porti SleepDoc进行多导睡眠图筛查。当AHI≥15 / h或AHI≥5 / h同时发生临床症状时,诊断为OSAS。结果:与对照组相比,研究组的ESS评分明显更高(8.9±5.9 vs. 11.6±5.2 pt,p <0.0001)。否则,根据BQ,高危人群的百分比之间没有显着的组间差异(83.7%vs.92.3%,p> 0.05).ESS和BQ的敏感性分别为53.2%和93.1%,而特异性分别是58.8%和16.2%。注意到ESS评分与AHI和呼吸暂停指数之间的相关性较差(分别为r = 0.22,p = 0.001和r = 0.24,p <0.001)。结论:鉴于ESS的敏感性较低,因此不应将其用作驾驶员候选OSAS诊断的筛选测试。 BQ的特征是对AHI≥15 / h的OSAS诊断具有很高的敏感性,但是由于特异性低,该问卷可能会增加接受不必要诊断程序的健康个体的数量。MedPr 2016; 67(6):721– 728

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号