首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study
【24h】

Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study

机译:椎板成形术后强化康复护理与传统护理的回顾性病例队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been shown to shorten length of hospital stay and reduce perioperative complications in many types of surgeries. However, there has been a paucity of research examining the application of ERAS to major spinal surgery. The current study was performed to compare complications and hospital stay after laminoplasty between an ERAS group and a traditional care group. The ERAS group included 114 patients who underwent laminoplasty managed with an ERAS protocol between January 2016 and June 2017. The traditional care group included 110 patients, who received traditional perioperative care between November 2014 and December 2015. Postoperative hospital stay (POPH), physiological function, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. The mean POPH was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than traditional care group (5.75 ± 2.46 vs. 7.67 ± 3.45 d, P .001). ERAS protocol significantly promoted postoperative early food-taking (8.45 ± 2.94 h vs 21.64 ± 2.66 h, P .001), reduced the first time of assisted walking (30.79 ± 14.45 vs. 65.24 ± 25.34 h, P .001), postoperative time of indwelling urinary catheters (24.76 ± 12.34 vs. 53.61 ± 18.16 h, P .001), and wound drainage catheters (43.92 ± 7.14 vs. 48.85 ± 10.10 h, P .001), as compared with the traditional care group. Pain control was better in the ERAS group than traditional care group in terms of mean VAS score (2.72 ± 0.46 vs. 3.35 ± 0.46, P .001) and mean maximum VAS score (3.76 ± 1.12 vs. 4.35 ± 1.15, P .001) in 3 days after surgery. The morbidity rate was 21.05% (24 of 114 patients) in the ERAS group and 20.90% (23 of 110 patients) in the control group ( P = .75). The ERAS protocol is both safe and feasible for patients undergoing laminoplasty , and can decrease the length of postoperative hospitalization without increasing the risk of complications .
机译:在许多类型的手术中,已显示出提高的术后恢复(ERAS)可以缩短住院时间并减少围手术期并发症。但是,很少有研究检查ERAS在大型脊柱外科手术中的应用。进行本研究的目的是比较ERAS组和传统护理组在椎板成形术后的并发症和住院时间。 ERAS组包括114名在2016年1月至2017年6月之间接受ERAS方案进行椎板成形术治疗的患者。传统护理组包括110名在2014年11月至2015年12月期间接受传统围手术期护理的患者。术后住院时间(POPH),生理功能,两组的术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分和术后并发症进行了比较。 ERAS组的平均POPH明显短于传统护理组(5.75±2.46 vs. 7.67±3.45 d,P <.001)。 ERAS协议显着促进了术后早期进食(8.45±2.94 h vs 21.64±2.66 h,P <.001),减少了首次辅助行走时间(30.79±14.45 vs. 65.24±25.34 h,P <.001),与传统护理相比,留置导尿管的术后时间(24.76±12.34 vs. 53.61±18.16 h,P <.001)和伤口引流导管(43.92±7.14 vs. 48.85±10.10 h,P <.001)组。就平均VAS评分(2.72±0.46 vs. 3.35±0.46,P <.001)和平均最大VAS评分(3.76±1.12 vs. 4.35±1.15,P < .001)在手术后3天。 ERAS组的发病率为21.05%(114例中的24例),而对照组的发病率为20.90%(110例中的23例)(P = .75)。 ERAS协议对进行椎板成形术的患者是安全可行的,并且可以缩短术后住院时间,而不会增加并发症的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号