...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Is perioperative colloid infusion more effective than crystalloid in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting?: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Is perioperative colloid infusion more effective than crystalloid in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:在预防术后恶心和呕吐方面,围手术期胶体输注是否比晶体更有效?:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Adequate intravenous fluid replacement is recommended as an effective nonpharmacologic strategy for reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), one of the most common and stressful complications of general anesthesia . We aimed to evaluate the effect of hydration, according to the type of fluid, on PONV as previous studies have reported inconsistent results. Methods: We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing infusion of colloid with that of crystalloid in terms of PONV incidence and the need for rescue antiemetic therapies for 24 hours after surgery under general anesthesia . The effect of fluid infusion according to the duration of anesthesia was also examined. A literature search was performed, using MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus, up to February 2018. Results: We included 8 RCTs. Compared with the crystalloid infusion, perioperative colloid infusion did not reduce PONV incidence, with a relative risk of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60–1.25). However, subgroup analysis by duration of anesthesia showed a statistically significant subgroup effect ( P = .04, I sup xmlns:mrws="http://webservices.ovid.com/mrws/1.0" 2 /sup = 77.4%), suggesting that the effect of colloid differed from that of crystalloid depending on the duration of anesthesia. In the subgroup that underwent anesthesia for more than 3 hours, in which the patients had mostly undergone abdominal surgeries, colloid infusion significantly reduced the incidence of PONV compared with crystalloid infusion (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53–0.89). In the subgroup that underwent anesthesia for 3 hours, colloid infusion did not reduce the incidence of PONV compared with crystalloid infusion (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.76–2.27). The requirement for antiemetics was comparable between colloid and crystalloid infusions, with an RR of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.55–1.58). Conclusion: Colloid administration had a more preventive effect on PONV than crystalloid administration in patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia for more than 3 hours but did not show a preventive effect in patients undergoing anesthesia for 3 hours.
机译:背景:建议采用适当的静脉补液作为减少术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的有效非药物治疗策略,PONV是全身麻醉中最常见和压力最大的并发症之一。我们的目的是根据流体的类型评估水合对PONV的影响,因为先前的研究报道了不一致的结果。方法:我们对全身麻醉后24小时PONV的发生率和术后需要进行急吐止吐治疗的情况进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较了胶体和晶体的输注量以及是否需要抢救止吐疗法。还检查了根据麻醉持续时间输液的效果。截止到2018年2月,使用MEDLINE,Excerpta Medica数据库,Cochrane对照试验中央登记册,Web of Science和Scopus进行了文献检索。结果:我们纳入了8个RCT。与晶状体输注相比,围手术期胶体输注并未降低PONV发生率,相对风险为0.87(95%置信区间[CI],0.60–1.25)。但是,按麻醉时间进行的亚组分析显示出统计学上显着的亚组效应(P = .04,I 2 = 77.4 %),表明根据麻醉的持续时间,胶体的作用与晶体的作用不同。在接受麻醉超过3小时的亚组中,大部分患者都接受了腹部手术,与晶体注射相比,胶体注射显着降低了PONV的发生率(RR,0.69; 95%CI,0.53-0.89)。在接受麻醉<3小时的亚组中,与晶体输注相比,胶体输注并未降低PONV的发生率(RR,1.32; 95%CI,0.76-2.27)。胶体注射液和晶体注射液对止吐药的需求相当,RR为0.93(95%CI,0.55-1.58)。结论:在全身麻醉下超过3小时进行腹部手术的患者中,胶体剂对PONV的预防作用要比晶体注射法更好,但是在麻醉时间<3小时的情况下,胶体给药对PONV的预防作用却没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号