...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Prognostic role of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: An up-to-date meta-analysis
【24h】

Prognostic role of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: An up-to-date meta-analysis

机译:淋巴细胞与单核细胞比率在大肠癌中的预后作用:最新荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: Although previous meta-analyses have proved that lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) is a prognostic factor in solid cancers, its prognostic role in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. We, therefore, conducted this up-to-date meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic role of the LMR in CRC. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and Embase for relevant studies in November 2016. Article assessing the prognostic role of LMR in CRC was enrolled in this meta-analysis. Data and characteristics of each study were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to generate pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival. Begg funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias. Results: Eleven studies published between 2014 and 2016 with a total of 9045 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Our findings indicated that a low LMR predicted a worse OS (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.30–1.90, P < .001) and disease-free survival. (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13–1.39, P < .001) for patients with CRC. Subgroup analyses according to stage (I–III and IV) and LMR cut-off value (<3.00 and ≥3.00) showed a significant prognostic value of LMR on OS. Begg funnel plot showed that publication bias existed in this meta-analysis. Conclusions: This up-to-date meta-analysis shows that a low LMR is associated with poor survival in patients with CRC, although the publication bias is existed. Large-sample multicenter prospective cohort is needed to assess the role of the LMR in CRC patients.
机译:背景:尽管先前的荟萃分析已证明淋巴细胞与单核细胞的比率(LMR)是实体癌的预后因素,但其在结直肠癌(CRC)中的预后作用仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了最新的荟萃分析,以评估LMR在CRC中的预后作用。方法:于2016年11月在PubMed和Embase中进行了系统搜索以寻找相关研究。该荟萃分析纳入了评估LMR在CRC中的预后作用的文章。提取每个研究的数据和特征。进行荟萃分析以生成总生存率(OS)和无病生存期的合并危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。使用Begg漏斗图评估出版偏倚。结果:这项荟萃分析纳入了2014年至2016年间发表的11项研究,总共9045名患者。我们的发现表明,低LMR预测更差的OS(HR 1.57,95%CI 1.30-1.90,P <0.001)和无病生存。 CRC患者(HR 1.25,95%CI 1.13-1.39,P <.001)。根据阶段(I–III和IV)和LMR截止值(<3.00和≥3.00)进行亚组分析显示,LMR对OS有明显的预后价值。 Begg漏斗图表明该荟萃分析中存在出版偏倚。结论:这项最新的荟萃分析表明,尽管存在发表偏倚,但低CRCR与CRC患者生存率低有关。需要大样本的多中心前瞻性队列来评估LMR在CRC患者中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号