首页> 外文期刊>Medical science monitor : >Degree of Enhancement on Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) and Lesion Type on Mammography (MG): Comparison Based on Histological Results
【24h】

Degree of Enhancement on Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) and Lesion Type on Mammography (MG): Comparison Based on Histological Results

机译:对比增强光谱乳腺摄影(CESM)的增强程度和乳腺造影(MG)的病变类型:基于组织学结果的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a new method of breast cancer diagnosis in which an iodinated contrast agent is injected and dual-energy mammography is obtained in multiple views of the breasts. The aim of this study was to compare the degree of enhancement on CESM with lesion characteristics on mammography (MG) and lesion histology in women with suspicious breast lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS The degree of enhancement on CESM (absent, weak, medium, or strong) was compared to lesion characteristics on MG (mass, mass with microcalcifications, or microcalcifications alone) and histology (infiltrating carcinoma, intraductal carcinoma, or benign) to compare sensitivity of the two modalities and to establish correlations that might improve diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS Among 225 lesions identified with CESM and MG, histological evaluation revealed 143 carcinomas (127 infiltrating, 16 intraductal) and 82 benign lesions. This is the largest cohort investigated with CESM to date. The sensitivity of CESM was higher than that of MG (100% and 90%, respectively, [i]p[/i]=0.010). Medium or strong enhancement on CESM and the presence of a mass on MG was the most likely indictor of malignancy (55.1% [i]p[/i]=0.002). Among benign lesions, 60% presented as enhancement on CESM (were false-positive), and most frequently as medium or weak enhancement, together with a mass on MG (53%, [i]p[/i]=0.047). Unfortunately, the study did not find combinations of MG findings and CESM enhancement patterns that would be helpful in defining false-positive lesions. We observed systematic overestimation of maximum lesion diameter on CESM compared to histology (mean difference: 2.29 mm). CONCLUSIONS Strong or medium enhancement on CESM and mass or mass with microcalcifications on MG were strong indicators of malignant transformation. However, we found no combination of MG and CESM characteristics helpful in defining false-positive lesions.
机译:背景技术对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术(CESM)是一种乳腺癌诊断的新方法,其中注射碘化造影剂并在乳房的多个视野中获得双能乳腺摄影术。这项研究的目的是比较可疑乳腺病变女性在乳腺X线摄影(MG)上的病变特征和病变组织学方面的CESM增强程度。材料和方法将CESM增强的程度(不存在,弱,中等或强)与MG的病变特征(质量,仅伴有微钙化的肿块或仅微钙化)和组织学(浸润癌,导管内癌或良性)进行比较。比较两种方法的敏感性,并建立可能提高诊断准确性的相关性。结果在通过CESM和MG鉴定的225个病变中,组织学评估显示143例癌(127例浸润,16例导管内癌)和82例良性病变。这是迄今为止CESM调查的最大队列。 CESM的敏感性高于MG(分别为[i] p [/ i] = 0.010)和100%。 CESM中度或强度增强以及MG上有肿块是最可能的恶性指标(55.1%[i] p [/ i] = 0.002)。在良性病变中,有60%表现为CESM增强(假阳性),最常见的表现为中度或微弱增强,以及MG肿块(53%,[i] p [/ i] = 0.047)。不幸的是,该研究未发现MG发现和CESM增强模式的组合有助于确定假阳性病变。我们观察到与组织学相比,CESM上最大病变直径的系统性高估(平均差异:2.29 mm)。结论MG的微钙化对CESM的强或中等增强以及肿块或肿块是恶性转化的有力指标。但是,我们发现没有MG和CESM特征的组合有助于定义假阳性病变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号