首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Fascicular Ratio: A New Parameter to Evaluate Peripheral Nerve Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Feasibility Study on a 3T MRI System
【24h】

Fascicular Ratio: A New Parameter to Evaluate Peripheral Nerve Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Feasibility Study on a 3T MRI System

机译:束状比:磁共振成像评估周围神经病理的新参数:3T MRI系统的可行性研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract: The objective of the study was to define and quantitatively evaluate the fascicular ratio (FR) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with peripheral neuropathies compared with healthy controls. Forty control subjects (20 women, 20 men; age, 44.6?±?13.4 years) and 40 patients with peripheral neuropathy (22 women, 18 men; age, 50.3?±?10.2 years) were examined with a standard 3T MRI protocol. With customized software (with semiautomatic and automatic interface), the hypointense and hyperintense areas of the peripheral nerves corresponding to fascicular and nonfascicular tissue were examined on T1-weighted sequences. The ratio of fascicular pixels to total pixels was called FR. Correlation with FR calculated on high-resolution ultrasound was performed. The statistical analysis included the Mann–Whitney U test of controls versus patients, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the subgroup analysis of patients according to etiologies of neuropathy. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was calculated based on the evaluation made by 3 readers. Finally, a complete automatic evaluation was performed. On MRI, FRs were significantly increased in patients compared with controls (FR, 76.7?±?15.1 vs 56?±?12.3; P?P?r?=?0.49; 95% confidence interval for r, 0.21–0.70; P?=?0.012). With the semiautomated evaluation, the mean intraobserver agreement was good (K?=?0.86). The interobserver agreements were also good (reader 1 vs reader 2, k?=?0.71; reader 2 vs reader 3, k?=?0.78; reader 3 vs reader 1, k?=?0.71). There were no statistically significant differences between the results obtained using the 2 methods. FR calculation on MRI is feasible, and it may be used in adjunct to standard MRI evaluation in peripheral nerve disorders.
机译:摘要:该研究的目的是定义和定量评估与健康对照组相比周围神经病患者的磁共振成像(MRI)束状比率(FR)。用标准的3T MRI方案检查了40名对照受试者(20名女性,20名男性;年龄44.6±13.4岁)和40名周围神经病变的患者(22名女性,18名男性;年龄50.3±10.2岁)。使用定制软件(具有半自动和自动界面),在T1加权序列上检查与束状和非束状组织相对应的周围神经的低信号和高信号区域。束状像素与总像素之比称为FR。进行与高分辨率超声计算的FR的相关性。统计分析包括对照患者的Mann-Whitney U检验,接受者操作特征(ROC)分析以及根据神经病病因对患者进行的亚组分析。观察者内部和观察者之间的协议是根据3位读者的评估计算得出的。最后,进行了完整的自动评估。在MRI上,与对照组相比,患者的FRs显着增加(FR为76.7±±15.1 vs 56±±12.3;P≥P≥r≥0.49; r的95%置信区间为0.21-0.70;P≥0.05。 =?0.012)。采用半自动评估,观察者的平均内部一致性良好(K = 0.86)。观察者之间的协议也很好(阅读器1与阅读器2,k = 0.71;阅读器2与阅读器3,k = 0.78;阅读器3与阅读器1,k = 0.71)。使用这两种方法获得的结果之间没有统计学上的显着差异。 MRI的FR计算是可行的,并且可以与周围神经疾病的标准MRI评估一起使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号