...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical principles and practice: international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre >Evaluation of the Performances of Two Rapid Diagnostic Tests (Cyscope?mini and Paracheck-Pf?) in the Diagnosis of Malaria among Febrile Children in Southwest Nigeria
【24h】

Evaluation of the Performances of Two Rapid Diagnostic Tests (Cyscope?mini and Paracheck-Pf?) in the Diagnosis of Malaria among Febrile Children in Southwest Nigeria

机译:评估尼日利亚西南部高热儿童中两种快速诊断测试(Cyscope?mini和Paracheck-Pf?)对疟疾的诊断性能

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic performances of Cyscope?mini and Paracheck-Pf? for Plasmodium falciparum relative to microscopy. Subjects and Methods: 209 children aged 6 months to 12 years presenting with symptoms suggestive of malaria were enrolled at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria, within a period of 6 months. Malaria parasites were identified in capillary blood samples using Cyscope?mini (parasite DNA-based fluorescence microscope) and Paracheck-Pf? (an HRP-II-based test) with microscopy of Giemsa-stained thick blood films as reference gold standard. The overall performances were calculated using OpenEpi version 2.3 statistical package. 209 samples were performed for Cyscope?mini and light microscopy while 140 samples were done by Paracheck-Pf?. Results: The prevalence of malaria parasitaemia by light microscopy was 22.0% (46/209), while those of Cyscope?mini and Paracheck-Pf? were 85.2% (178/209) and 32.1% (45/140), respectively. Parasite density ranged from 40 to 203,883/μl. Cyscope?mini and Paracheck-Pf? had sensitivities of 91.3 and 86.21%, respectively. The respective specificities were 16.56 and 81.98% for Cyscope?mini and Paracheck-Pf? with diagnostic accuracies of 33.01 and 82.86%. The diagnostic performances of the two rapid diagnostic tests were significantly different. Conclusion: Paracheck-Pf? performed better than Cyscope?mini for diagnosis of falciparum malaria and will be a good diagnostic tool for field studies.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是测试Cyscope?mini和Paracheck-Pf?的诊断性能。相对于显微镜的恶性疟原虫。受试者与方法:在6个月内,将209名年龄在6个月至12岁之间,表现出疟疾症状的儿童纳入尼日利亚伊巴丹大学医院。使用Cyscope?mini(基于寄生虫DNA的荧光显微镜)和Paracheck-Pf?在毛细管血样本中鉴定出疟原虫。 (基于HRP-II的测试)以吉姆萨染色的厚血膜的显微镜作为参考金标准。使用OpenEpi 2.3版统计软件包计算总体性能。对Cyscope?mini和光学显微镜进行了209个采样,而通过Paracheck-Pf?对140个采样进行了采样。结果:光学显微镜下疟疾寄生虫病的患病率为22.0%(46/209),而Cyscope?mini和Paracheck-Pf?的患病率为22.0%(46/209)。分别为85.2%(178/209)和32.1%(45/140)。寄生虫密度范围为40至203883 /μl。 Cyscope?mini和Paracheck-Pf?的敏感性分别为91.3%和86.21%。 Cyscope?mini和Paracheck-Pf?的特异性分别为16.56和81.98%。诊断准确率分别为33.01和82.86%。两种快速诊断测试的诊断性能显着不同。结论:Paracheck-Pf?在恶性疟疾的诊断方面比Cyscope?mini更好,并且将是现场研究的良好诊断工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号