...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Education Online >Is it a match? a novel method of evaluating medical school success
【24h】

Is it a match? a novel method of evaluating medical school success

机译:是火柴吗?一种评估医学院成功的新方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Medical education program evaluation allows for curricular improvements to both Undergraduate (UME) and Graduate Medical Education (GME). UME programs are left with little more than match rates and self-report to evaluate success of graduates in The Match.Objective: This manuscript shares a novel method of program evaluation through a systematic assessment of Match outcomes.Design: Surveys were developed and distributed to Program Training Directors (PTDs) at our institution to classify residency programs into which our UME graduates matched using an ordinal response scale and open-ended responses. Outcomes-based measures for UME graduates were collected and analyzed. The relationship between PTD survey data and UME graduates’ outcomes were explored. Open-ended response data were qualitatively analyzed using iterative cycles of coding and identifying themes.Results: The PTD survey response rate was 100%. 71% of our graduates matched to programs ranked as ‘elite’ (36%) or ‘top’ (35%) tier. The mean total number of ‘Honors’ grades achieved by UME graduates was 2.6. Data showed that graduates entering elite and top GME programs did not consistently earn Honors in their associated clerkships. A positive correlation was identified between USMLE Step 1 score, number of honors, and residency program rankings for a majority of the programs. Qualitative analysis identified research, faculty, and clinical exposure as necessary characteristics of ‘elite’ programs:. Factors considered by PTDs in the rating of programs included reputation, faculty, research, national presence and quality of graduates.Conclusions: This study describes a novel outcomes-based method of evaluating the success of UME programs. Results provided useful feedback about the quality of our UME program and its ability to produce graduates who match in highly-regarded GME programs. The findings from this study can benefit Clerkship Directors, Student Affairs and Curriculam Deans, and residency PTDs as they help students determine their competitiveness forspecialties and specific residency programs.
机译:背景:医学教育课程评估可对本科(UME)和研究生医学教育(GME)进行课程改进。 UME计划只剩下匹配率和自我报告,以评估The Match的毕业生成功程度。目标:该手稿通过系统地评估Match结果分享一种新颖的计划评估方法。设计:调查被开发并分发给我们机构的计划培训主管(PTD)使用顺序反应量表和不限成员名额的反应量来对我们的UME毕业生所匹配的居住计划进行分类。收集并分析了针对UME毕业生的基于结果的测度。探索了PTD调查数据与UME毕业生的成绩之间的关系。使用编码和识别主题的迭代循环定性分析开放式响应数据。结果:PTD调查的响应率为100%。我们有71%的毕业生符合“精英”(36%)或“顶级”(35%)等级的课程。 UME毕业生获得的“荣誉”等级平均总数为2.6。数据显示,进入精英和顶级GME课程的毕业生在其相关业务中并没有始终获得荣誉。在USMLE步骤1得分,荣誉数量和大多数计划的居留计划排名之间确定了正相关。定性分析将研究,教职员工和临床接触确定为“精英”计划的必要特征: PTD在计划评级中考虑的因素包括声誉,教师,研究,国家存在和毕业生质量。结论:本研究描述了一种基于成果的新颖方法来评估UME计划的成功。结果提供了有关我们的UME计划质量及其培养出与备受推崇的GME计划相匹配的毕业生的能力的有用反馈。这项研究的结果可以使书记主任,学生事务和课程主任以及居留PTD受益,因为它们可以帮助学生确定专业和特定居留计划的竞争力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号