首页> 外文期刊>Medical Education Online >Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world
【24h】

Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world

机译:电子病历中的书写和阅读:全新的世界

获取原文
       

摘要

Background : Electronic health records (EHRs) are structured, distributed documentation systems that differ from paper charts. These systems require skills not traditionally used to navigate a paper chart and to produce a written clinic note. Despite these differences, little attention has been given to physicians’ electronic health record (EHR)-writing and -reading competence. Purposes : This study aims to investigate physicians’ self-assessed competence to document and to read EHR notes; writing and reading preferences in an EHR; and demographic characteristics associated with their perceived EHR ability and preference. Methods : Fourteen 5-point Likert scale items, based on EHR system characteristics and a literature review, were developed to measure EHR-writing and -reading competence and preference. Physicians in the midwest region of the United States were invited via e-mail to complete the survey online from February to April 2011. Factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted to provide validity and reliability of the instrument. Correlation and regression analysis were conducted to pursue answers to the research questions. Results : Ninety-one physicians (12.5%), from general and specialty fields, working in inpatient and outpatient settings, participated in the survey. Despite over 3 years of EHR experience, respondents perceived themselves to be incompetent in EHR writing and reading (Mean = 2.74, SD = 0.76). They preferred to read succinct, narrative notes in EHR systems. However, physicians with higher perceived EHR-writing and -reading competence had less preference toward reading succinct (r = ? 0.33, p 0.001) and narrative (r = ? 0.36, p 0.001) EHR notes than physicians with lower perceived EHR competence. Physicians’ perceived EHR-writing and -reading competence was strongly related to their EHR navigation skills (r =0.55, p 0.0001). Conclusions : Writing and reading EHR documentation is different for physicians. Maximizing navigation skills can optimize non-linear EHR writing and reading. Pedagogical questions remain related to how physicians and medical students are able to retrieve correct information effectively and to understand thought patterns in collectively lengthier and sometimes fragmented EHR chart notes.
机译:背景:电子健康记录(EHR)是结构化的分布式文档系统,与纸质海图不同。这些系统需要传统上不用于导航纸质海图和产生书面临床笔记的技能。尽管存在这些差异,但医生的电子健康记录(EHR)的书写和阅读能力却很少受到关注。 目的:本研究旨在调查医师自我评估的能力,以记录和阅读EHR注释;电子病历中的写作和阅读偏好;以及与其感知的EHR能力和偏好相关的人口统计特征。方法:根据EHR系统特征和文献综述,开发了14个5点李克特量表项目,以测量EHR的写作和阅读能力以及偏好。通过电子邮件邀请美国中西部地区的医师从2011年2月至2011年4月在线完成调查。进行了因子分析和可靠性测试,以提供该仪器的有效性和可靠性。进行了相关和回归分析以寻求研究问题的答案。 结果:来自普通和专业领域的91位医师(12.5%)在住院和门诊工作,参与了调查。尽管有3年以上的EHR经验,但受访者认为自己在EHR写作和阅读方面不称职(平均值= 2.74,SD = 0.76)。他们更喜欢阅读EHR系统中简洁的叙述性注释。但是,具有较高EHR写作和阅读能力的医生对阅读简洁( = 0.36, p)的偏爱较少。 <0.001)EHR注意事项比具有较低EHR能力的医生要注意。医师对EHR的写作和阅读能力的感知与他们的EHR导航技巧密切相关( r = 0.55, p <0.0001)。结论:撰写和阅读EHR文档对医生而言是不同的。最大化导航技能可以优化非线性EHR的写作和阅读。教育学方面的问题仍然与医师和医学生如何能够有效地检索正确的信息,以及如何在更长的,有时是零散的EHR图表注释中理解思维模式有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号