首页> 外文期刊>Medical Education Online >Feedback in formative OSCEs: comparison between direct observation and video-based formats
【24h】

Feedback in formative OSCEs: comparison between direct observation and video-based formats

机译:形成性OSCE中的反馈:直接观察与基于视频的格式之间的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionMedical students at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland, have the opportunity to practice clinical skills with simulated patients during formative sessions in preparation for clerkships. These sessions are given in two formats: 1) direct observation of an encounter followed by verbal feedback (direct feedback) and 2) subsequent review of the videotaped encounter by both student and supervisor (video-based feedback). The aim of the study was to evaluate whether content and process of feedback differed between both formats.MethodsIn 2013, all second- and third-year medical students and clinical supervisors involved in formative sessions were asked to take part in the study. A sample of audiotaped feedback sessions involving supervisors who gave feedback in both formats were analyzed (content and process of the feedback) using a 21-item feedback scale.ResultsForty-eight audiotaped feedback sessions involving 12 supervisors were analyzed (2 direct and 2 video-based sessions per supervisor). When adjusted for the length of feedback, there were significant differences in terms of content and process between both formats; the number of communication skills and clinical reasoning items addressed were higher in the video-based format (11.29 vs. 7.71, p= 0.002 and 3.71 vs. 2.04, p= 0.010, respectively). Supervisors engaged students more actively during the video-based sessions than during direct feedback sessions (self-assessment: 4.00 vs. 3.17, p= 0.007; active problem-solving: 3.92 vs. 3.42, p= 0.009). Students made similar observations and tended to consider that the video feedback was more useful for improving some clinical skills.ConclusionVideo-based feedback facilitates discussion of clinical reasoning, communication, and professionalism issues while at the same time actively engaging students. Different time and conceptual frameworks may explain observed differences. The choice of feedback format should depend on the educational goal.
机译:简介瑞士日内瓦大学医学院的医学生有机会在形成性会议期间与模拟患者一起练习临床技能,以准备担任职员。这些会议有两种格式:1)直接观察相遇,然后进行口头反馈(直接反馈); 2)随后由学生和主管对录像相遇进行回顾(基于视频的反馈)。该研究的目的是评估两种形式之间反馈的内容和过程是否不同。方法2013年,所有参与形成性课程的第二年和第三年医学生和临床指导者均被要求参加该研究。使用21个项目的反馈量表分析了涉及以两种格式提供反馈的主管的录音反馈会议样本(反馈的内容和过程)。结果分析了涉及12名主管的48项录音反馈会议(2个直接主管和2个视频主管)每个主管的会议)。调整反馈时间长度后,两种格式在内容和处理上都存在显着差异;在基于视频的格式中,所解决的沟通技巧和临床推理项目的数量更高(分别为11.29对7.71,p = 0.002和3.71对2.04,p = 0.010)。与基于视频的会议相比,督导员更积极地吸引学生(自我评估:4.00与3.17, p = 0.007;积极解决问题的方法:3.92与3.42, p = 0.009) 。学生进行了类似的观察,并倾向于认为视频反馈对于提高某些临床技能更有用。结论基于视频的反馈有助于讨论临床推理,沟通和专业问题,同时积极地吸引学生。不同的时间和概念框架可能会解释观察到的差异。反馈格式的选择应取决于教育目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号