...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical science monitor : >The diagnostic accuracy of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis in diagnosing dehydration after stroke
【24h】

The diagnostic accuracy of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis in diagnosing dehydration after stroke

机译:多频生物电阻抗分析在中风后脱水诊断中的诊断准确性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Non-invasive methods for detecting water-loss dehydration following acute stroke would be clinically useful. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MF-BIA) against reference standards serum osmolality and osmolarity. Material and Methods Patients admitted to an acute stroke unit were recruited. Blood samples for electrolytes and osmolality were taken within 20 minutes of MF-BIA. Total body water (TBW%), intracellular (ICW%) and extracellular water (ECW%), as percentages of total body weight, were calculated by MF-BIA equipment and from impedance measures using published equations for older people. These were compared to hydration status (based on serum osmolality and calculated osmolarity). The most promising Receiver Operating Characteristics curves were plotted. Results 27 stroke patients were recruited (mean age 71.3, SD10.7). Only a TBW% cut-off at 46% was consistent with current dehydration (serum osmolality >300 mOsm/kg) and TBW% at 47% impending dehydration (calculated osmolarity ≥295–300 mOsm/L) with sensitivity and specificity both >60%. Even here diagnostic accuracy of MF-BIA was poor, a third of those with dehydration were wrongly classified as hydrated and a third classified as dehydrated were well hydrated. Secondary analyses assessing diagnostic accuracy of TBW% for men and women separately, and using TBW as a percentage of lean body mass showed some promise, but did not provide diagnostically accurate measures across the population. Conclusions MF-BIA appears ineffective at diagnosing water-loss dehydration after stroke and cannot be recommended as a test for dehydration, but separating assessment by sex, and using TBW as a percentage of lean body weight may warrant further investigation.
机译:背景技术用于检测急性中风后失水脱水的非侵入性方法在临床上将是有用的。我们针对参考标准血清渗透压和渗透压评估了多频生物电阻抗分析(MF-BIA)的诊断准确性。材料和方法招募急性卒中单元的患者。在MF-BIA的20分钟内采集血样中的电解质和渗透压。通过MF-BIA设备并使用公开的老年人方程式,通过阻抗测量,计算出总水量(TBW%),细胞内水(ICW%)和细胞外水(ECW%)。将这些与水合状态进行比较(基于血清渗透压和计算的渗透压)。绘制了最有希望的接收器工作特性曲线。结果招募了27名中风患者(平均年龄71.3,SD10.7)。仅有46%的TBW%截止值与当前脱水(血清重量摩尔渗透压浓度> 300 mOsm / kg)和47%即将发生脱水的TBW%(计算重量克分子渗透浓度≥295–300 mOsm / L)一致,灵敏度和特异性均> 60 %。即使在这里,MF-BIA的诊断准确性也很差,三分之一的脱水患者被错误地归类为水合,三分之一的患者被归类为充分水合。二次分析分别评估了男性和女性的TBW%的诊断准确性,并使用TBW作为瘦体重的百分比显示了一些希望,但并未为整个人群提供诊断准确的方法。结论MF-BIA在诊断中风后失水脱水方面似乎无效,不能推荐作为脱水试验,但按性别分开评估,并以TBW作为瘦体重的百分比可能值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号