...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical science monitor : >A comparative study of cefaclor vs amoxicillin/clavulanate in pediatric pharyngotonsillitis.
【24h】

A comparative study of cefaclor vs amoxicillin/clavulanate in pediatric pharyngotonsillitis.

机译:头孢克洛与阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐治疗小儿咽喉炎的比较研究。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Pharyngotonsillitis (PT) caused by group A beta hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) is one of the most common infections of childhood. Two antibiotic suspensions, cefaclor (CEF) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), are commonly used in Poland for the treatment of PT caused by GABHS in children. MATERIAL/METHODS: This multi-center, randomized, single-blinded study was undertaken in order to compare the efficacy and safety of CEF (20 mg/kg/d) and AMC (25 mg/kg/d) in 10 days treatment of GABHS-related PT. 100 children (mean age 6 years) were enrolled into the study. Clinical and bacteriological assessments were done on the 14-18 th, and 38-45 th days after randomization. RESULTS: No GABHS strain isolated from throat smears was resistant in vitro to both antibiotics. Both antibiotics had almost 98% effectiveness at the post therapy visit. On follow-up, significantly more relapses and recurrences were observed in the AMC-treated group than in the CEF-treated group (relapse rate 21.28% vs 15.56%, p<0.02, recurrence 10.64% vs 6.66%, p<0.002). The relapse odds ratio in the AMC group was 1.7 times greater than in the CEF group, and recurrence was 1.5 times higher. There were significantly higher rates of gastrointestinal adverse events in children treated by AMC (p<0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CEF provides a clinically and bacteriologically effective treatment for children with PT caused by GABHS, comparable to AMC but significantly safer in terms of gastrointestinal side effects. AMC shows a greater risk of relapse and recurrence than CEF.
机译:背景:由A组β溶血性链球菌(GABHS)引起的咽炎(PT)是儿童最常见的感染之一。波兰通常使用两种抗生素悬浮液头孢克洛(CEF)和阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐(AMC)来治疗儿童GABHS引起的PT。材料/方法:进行这项多中心,随机,单盲研究,以比较CEF(20 mg / kg / d)和AMC(25 mg / kg / d)在10天治疗中的疗效和安全性。 GABHS相关的PT。 100名儿童(平均年龄6岁)被纳入研究。在随机分组后的第14-18天和第38-45天进行临床和细菌学评估。结果:从喉涂片中分离出的GABHS菌株在体外对两种抗生素均无耐药性。两种抗生素在治疗后的访问中几乎有98%的有效性。随访发现,AMC治疗组的复发和复发率明显高于CEF治疗组(复发率分别为21.28%vs. 15.56%,p <0.02,复发率10.64%vs 6.66%,p <0.002)。 AMC组的复发几率比CEF组高1.7倍,复发率高1.5倍。 AMC治疗的儿童胃肠道不良事件发生率明显更高(p <0.02)。结论:CEF为由GABHS引起的PT患儿提供了临床和细菌学上有效的治疗方法,与AMC相当,但在胃肠道副作用方面明显更安全。与CEF相比,AMC显示出更大的复发和复发风险。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号