首页> 外文期刊>Medical science monitor : >‘Coalition-In-Iraq’ Countries ‘Internal’ civil violent deaths compared to the USA ‘External’ violence of September 11th 2001
【24h】

‘Coalition-In-Iraq’ Countries ‘Internal’ civil violent deaths compared to the USA ‘External’ violence of September 11th 2001

机译:与2001年9月11日在美国发生的“外部”暴力相比,“在伊拉克的联盟”国家中的“内部”平民暴力死亡

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:The atrocity of 9/11 exemplified ‘external’ caused civil violent deaths, which have major policy implications for the countries contributing armed forces to the ‘Coalition-In-Iraq’ [C.I.I]. C.I.I Government’s resources for perennial ’internal’ violent deaths (suicide, homicide and road), are likely to be threatened by alternative priorities. C.I.I ‘internal’ deaths are compared with those of 9/11 to provide information to determine relative risks.Material/Methods: To uniformly compare mortality between countries we utilise the most recent WHO mortality data, taking the latest three years 1997–1999 and calculating an average annual number and rate of ‘internal’ deaths in each country, these are compared with the 9/11 fatalities, calculating a proportional ratio, as an indicator of differential damage to families and society.Results: USA ‘external’ deaths were 3,074 people and annual average suicides were 30,966. Total ‘internal’ deaths exceeded ‘external’ more than 30 times. Every fortnight there are more USA ‘internal’ violent deaths than on 9/11. Except Australia and Bulgaria, every country had more suicides than died on 9/11. Apart from Bulgaria, total ‘internal’ deaths exceeded the ‘external’ toll in all other CAI countries- by 14 times in Japan; 6 in Republic of Korea, 4 in Italy, 3 in Spain and the UK, twice in Canada and 1.5 times in Australia.Conclusions: The extent of ‘internal’ civil violent deaths, such as suicide, highlight the perennial pressures upon psychiatric services and the need to defend resources at a time of competing priorities.
机译:背景:9/11的残暴表现是“外部”造成的平民暴力死亡,这对向“伊拉克同盟” [C.I.I]派遣武装部队的国家具有重大政策影响。 C.I.I政府常年用于“内部”暴力死亡(自杀,凶杀和道路死亡)的资源可能会受到其他优先事项的威胁。将CII的“内部”死亡与9/11的死亡进行比较,以提供确定相对风险的信息。材料/方法:为了统一比较各国之间的死亡率,我们使用了WHO的最新死亡率数据,采用了1997-1999年的最新三年数据,并进行了计算。将每个国家/地区的平均每年“内部”死亡人数和死亡率与9/11死亡人数进行比较,计算比例,以作为对家庭和社会的不同损害的指标。结果:美国的“外部”死亡人数为3,074人和平均每年自杀为30,966。 “内部”死亡总数超过“外部”死亡30倍以上。每两周,美国“内部”暴力死亡人数要高于9/11。除澳大利亚和保加利亚外,每个国家的自杀人数都超过9/11死亡人数。除保加利亚外,在所有其他CAI国家中,“内部”死亡总数超过“外部”死亡人数-在日本是14倍;大韩民国有6人,意大利有4人,西班牙和英国有3人,加拿大有2人,澳大利亚有1.5人。结论:自杀等“内部”民事暴力死亡的程度凸显了精神病学和医疗服务的长期压力。在优先事项相互竞争时捍卫资源的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号