首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
【24h】

Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations

机译:慢和快速的响应:脑电图振荡揭示了审判结果处理的两种机制。

获取原文
           

摘要

Cognitive control includes maintenance of task-specific processes related to attention, and non-specific regulation of motor threshold. Depending upon the nature of the behavioral tasks, these mechanisms may predispose to different kinds of errors, with either increased or decreased response time (RT) of erroneous responses relative to correct responses. Specifically, slow responses are related to attentional lapses and decision uncertainty, these conditions tending to delay RTs of both erroneous and correct responses. Here we studied if RT may be a valid approximation distinguishing trials with high and low levels of sustained attention and decision uncertainty. We analyzed response-related and feedback-related modulations in theta, alpha and beta band activity in the auditory version of the two-choice condensation task, which is highly demanding for sustained attention while involves no inhibition of prepotent responses. Depending upon response speed and accuracy, trials were divided into slow correct, slow erroneous, fast correct and fast erroneous. We found that error-related frontal midline theta (FMT) was present only on fast erroneous trials. The feedback-related FMT was equally strong on slow erroneous and fast erroneous trials. Late post-response posterior alpha suppression was stronger on erroneous slow trials. Feedback-related frontal beta was present only on slow correct trials. The data obtained cumulatively suggests that RT allows distinguishing the two types of trials, with fast trials related to higher levels of attention and low uncertainty, and slow trials related to lower levels of attention and higher uncertainty.
机译:认知控制包括与注意力相关的任务特定过程的维护,以及运动阈值的非特定调节。取决于行为任务的性质,这些机制可能会引发不同类型的错误,相对于正确的响应,错误响应的响应时间(RT)会增加或减少。具体而言,缓慢的响应与注意失误和决策不确定性有关,这些条件往往会延迟错误响应和正确响应的RT。在这里,我们研究了RT是否可能是一种有效的近似方法,可以区分持续关注和决策不确定性的高低水平试验。我们分析了两选缩合任务的听觉版本中θ,α和β谱带活动中与响应相关和与反馈相关的调制,这对持续关注的要求很高,同时不抑制潜在响应。根据响应速度和准确性,将试验分为慢正确,慢错误,快速正确和快速错误。我们发现与错误相关的额中线theta(FMT)仅在快速错误的试验中出现。与反馈相关的FMT在缓慢错误和快速错误试验中同样强大。在错误的慢速试验中,响应后后期阿尔法抑制作用更强。反馈相关的额叶β仅在缓慢的正确试验中存在。累积获得的数据表明,RT可以区分两种类型的试验,与注意力较高和不确定性较低相关的快速试验,与注意力较低和不确定性较高相关的缓慢试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号