首页> 外文期刊>Medical Devices: Evidence and Research >Clinical and radiographic outcomes with L4–S1 axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) and posterior instrumentation: a multicenter study
【24h】

Clinical and radiographic outcomes with L4–S1 axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) and posterior instrumentation: a multicenter study

机译:L4–S1轴向腰椎椎间融合术(AxiaLIF)和后路器械的临床和影像学结果:一项多中心研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Previous studies have confirmed the benefits and limitations of the presacral retroperitoneal approach for L5–S1 interbody fusion. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of the minimally invasive axial lumbar interbody approach (AxiaLIF) for L4–S1 fusion. Methods: In this retrospective series, 52 patients from four clinical sites underwent L4–S1 interbody fusion with the AxiaLIF two-level system with minimum 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up (range: 24–51 months). Outcomes included back pain severity (on a 10-point scale), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Odom's criteria. Flexion and extension radiographs, as well as computed tomography scans, were evaluated to determine fusion status. Longitudinal outcomes were assessed with repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: Mean subject age was 52 ± 11 years and the male:female ratio was 1:1. Patients sustained no intraoperative bowel or vascular injury, deep infection, or neurologic complication. Median procedural blood loss was 220 cc and median length of hospital stay was 3 days. At 2-year follow-up, mean back pain had improved 56%, from 7.7 ± 1.6 at baseline to 3.4 ± 2.7 (P < 0.001). Back pain clinical success (ie, ≥30% improvement from baseline) was achieved in 39 (75%) patients at 2 years. Mean ODI scores improved 42%, from 60% ± 16% at baseline to 35% ± 27% at 2 years (P < 0.001). ODI clinical success (ie, ≥30% improvement from baseline) was achieved in 26 (50%) patients. At final follow-up, 45 (87%) patients were rated as good or excellent, five as fair, and two as poor by Odom's criteria. Interbody fusion observed on imaging was achieved in 97 (93%) of 104 treated interspaces. During follow-up, five patients underwent reoperation on the lumbar spine, including facet screw removal (two), laminectomy (two), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (one). Conclusion: The AxiaLIF two-level device is a safe, effective treatment adjunct for patients with L4–S1 disc pathology resistant to conservative treatments.
机译:简介:先前的研究证实了s前腹膜后方法对L5–S1椎间融合的好处和局限性。这项研究的目的是确定用于L4–S1融合的微创轴向腰椎椎体间入路(AxiaLIF)的安全性和有效性。方法:在这个回顾性系列研究中,来自四个临床地点的52例患者接受了AxiaLIF两级系统的L4–S1椎间融合术,并进行了至少2年的临床和影像学随访(范围:24–51个月)。结果包括腰痛严重程度(10分制),Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和Odom的标准。评估屈伸X线片以及计算机断层扫描,以确定融合状态。纵向结果通过重复测量方差分析进行评估。结果:受试者平均年龄为52±11岁,男女之比为1:1。患者无术中肠或血管损伤,深部感染或神经系统并发症。中程出血量为220 cc,中位住院时间为3天。在2年的随访中,平均背痛改善了56%,从基线的7.7±1.6改善为3.4±2.7(P <0.001)。在2年时,有39名(75%)的患者获得了背痛的临床成功(即,与基线相比改善了≥30%)。平均ODI分数提高了42%,从基线时的60%±16%提高到2年时的35%±27%(P <0.001)。 26名(50%)患者获得了ODI临床成功(即,比基线提高了≥30%)。在最后的随访中,按照奥多姆的标准,有45名(87%)患者被评为好或好,五名为一般,两名为差。通过成像观察到的椎间融合是在104个经过处理的间隙中的97个(93%)中实现的。在随访期间,五名患者在腰椎上进行了再次手术,包括小平面螺钉切除术(两个),椎板切除术(两个)和经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(一个)。结论:AxiaLIF两级装置是对保守治疗有抵抗力的L4–S1椎间盘病变患者的一种安全,有效的治疗辅助手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号