首页> 外文期刊>Medical Devices: Evidence and Research >Patient-based outcome analysis is important to determine the success of total knee arthroplasty: result of a focus group discussion
【24h】

Patient-based outcome analysis is important to determine the success of total knee arthroplasty: result of a focus group discussion

机译:基于患者的结果分析对于确定全膝关节置换术的成功至关重要:焦点小组讨论的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Total knee replacement (TKR) results in an excellent outcome in terms of pain relief. The reporting of outcomes was traditionally focused on implant survivorship and objective outcomes such as range of motion, knee stability, and radiographic alignment. However, patients and doctors had differing perceptions of all domains of outcome, especially subjective quality of life domains such as emotions and social functioning. In this study, we tried to find out the expectations of Indian patients regarding TKR and assess the level of satisfaction among our patients from their view point using focus group discussion (FGD), and whether these expectations have an impact on outcomes and patient satisfaction. Materials and methods: This study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India, in November 2014. Patients between the ages 60 and 65 years who met inclusion criteria were selected. A total of 50 patients were selected for FGDs. Among them, 42 patients participated in FGD. The remaining eight did not appear for the discussion. A total of four FGD sessions were conducted. Results and discussion: It was found that there is a discrepancy between the satisfaction levels of patient and surgeon. There is a difference in satisfaction level achieved depending on socioeconomic, geographic, and cultural characteristics. Conclusion: Newer methods of TKR outcome assessment combining radiological outcome, surgeon-based assessment, and patient satisfaction based on their socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics should be developed for different populations.
机译:背景:全膝关节置换术(TKR)在缓解疼痛方面具有出色的疗效。传统上,结果的报告通常集中在植入物的存活率和客观结果上,例如运动范围,膝盖稳定性和X线照相对准。但是,患者和医生对结果的所有领域都有不同的看法,尤其是生活领域的主观质量,例如情感和社会功能。在这项研究中,我们试图通过焦点小组讨论(FGD)找出印度患者对TKR的期望,并从他们的观点评估患者的满意度,以及这些期望是否对结果和患者满意度产生影响。材料和方法:这项研究于2014年11月在印度喀拉拉邦科泽科德市政府医学院的骨科进行。选择符合入选标准的60至65岁患者。总共选择了50例FGD患者。其中,有42例患者参加了烟气脱硫。其余八个人没有出现在讨论中。总共进行了四场烟气脱硫会议。结果与讨论:发现患者和外科医生的满意度之间存在差异。根据社会经济,地理和文化特征,满意度会有所不同。结论:应针对不同人群开发结合放射线结局,基于外科医生的评估以及基于患者的社会经济状况和文化特征的患者满意度的更新的TKR结果评估方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号