...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Editorial: Can't Get You Out of My Head: Brain-Body Interactions in Perseverative Cognition
【24h】

Editorial: Can't Get You Out of My Head: Brain-Body Interactions in Perseverative Cognition

机译:社论:无法摆脱困境:持久性认知中的脑机互动

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Perseverative cognition represents a prototypical example of how our internal thoughts can impact our psychological and physical health, as if we were facing an actual environmental stressor (Brosschot et al., 2006 ). The mechanisms involved—together with other emblematic examples like the placebo effect—provide clear evidence for brain-body interaction. This collection of articles presents recent advances in our understanding of perseverative cognition that have arisen from the integration of multidisciplinary approaches encompassing cognitive and clinical psychology, affective neuroscience, and autonomic physiology. These advances carry with them the promise of more effective treatments to mitigate the negative consequences of maladaptive perseverative cognition on health and well-being.All contributions to the present Research Topic share a definition of perseverative cognition as a rigid pattern of habitual repetitive thoughts that perpetuates threat/stress responses through a characteristic failure of regulatory inhibition. Physiologically, perseverative cognition is expressed across multiple axes, including cardiovascular, autonomic, and endocrine systems (Ottaviani et al., 2016 ). Among physiological indices, heart rate variability (HRV) has emerged over the past decade as a biomarker that is particularly well-suited for indexing the inflexibility intrinsic to perseverative cognition. In fact, the adaptive rapid application and withdrawal of vagal parasympathetic inhibition, reflected in HRV, is viewed as a dynamic substrate for flexible behavioral routines (Porges, 2007 ).The first group of papers precisely explores this link between perseverative cognition and HRV. Two papers in particular combine the measurement of autonomic inflexibility, indexed by HRV, with measures of attentional/cognitive rigidity that characterizes perseverative cognition: Gazzellini et al. reveal that individuals who are highly prone to worrisome thinking show increased variability in reaction times (following a periodic oscillating pattern), recurrent lapses in attention, and concomitant oscillating heart rate. The authors suggest that, at a central level, these predictable fluctuations are mediated by midline cortical structures belonging to the default mode network. Spangler and Friedman provide relevant evidence for cardiac vagal control as an index of the availability of working memory resources: Anxiety impairs one's ability to focus attention and inhibit distractors. Minimal working memory load can attenuate this detrimental effect of anxiety, but heavier working memory demands may compromise attentional inhibition to the same extent as anxiety itself. Cropley et al. leave the laboratory setting in pursuit of a more ecological evaluation of perseverative cognition and HRV. This combined ambulatory assessment, over three consecutive evenings, provides the first evidence that individuals who have a tendency to ruminate about work also have lower HRV after work, when compared to individuals who report low levels of work-related rumination.The contribution of Williams et al . takes a fairly different perspective in which HRV is considered as a trigger, rather than a consequence, of perseverative cognition. This is based on the assumption that individuals with lower resting HRV are more vulnerable to stress, and therefore are more likely to engage in maladaptive types of perseverative cognition (e.g., brooding rumination). Moreover, an indirect effect of maladaptive perseverative cognition on resting HRV can feedback to make these same individuals more susceptible to anxiety symptoms. Notably, adaptive types of rumination (i.e., reflective rumination) do not significantly mediate this association, suggesting that not all rumination is pathogenic. The paper by Diamond and Fisher applies similar notions to major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and social anxiety disorder by exploring autonomic stress responses to a clinical diagnostic interview in these clinical populations and matched controls. The groups showing the highest autonomic rigidity during the interview were high-worriers, and patients with GAD, who have perseverative cognition as diagnostic requirement. The authors conclude that shared transdiagnostic features, notably worry and suppression, rather than diagnostic comorbidities, account for physiological reactivity across patient groups.It is important to note that the pathogenic effects of rumination can be partially explained by its capacity to engender behaviors that put health at risk (substance use, alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating, and smoking), as shown by the meta-analysis conducted by Clancy et al . Surprisingly, this route could not be demonstrated for worry. This contribution elegantly illustrates that another plausible route linking rumination to disease is via poorer health behaviors.Both Toh and Vasey and Meeten et al. provide unique information about the processes u
机译:持久的认知代表了我们的内部思想如何影响我们的心理和身体健康的典型例子,就像我们面对的是真正的环境压力一样(Brosschot等,2006)。所涉及的机制以及其他标志性例子(如安慰剂效应)一起为脑与人体的相互作用提供了清晰的证据。该系列文章介绍了我们对持久性认知的最新进展,这是由多学科方法(包括认知和临床心理学,情感神经科学和植物生理学)整合而产生的。这些进步为他们带来了更有效的治疗方法,有望减轻适应不良的持久性认知对健康和福祉的负面影响。对本研究主题的所有贡献都将持久性认知定义为持久的习惯性重复性思维的刚性模式。通过监管抑制的典型失效来应对威胁/压力反应。在生理上,持久性认知是跨多个轴表达的,包括心血管系统,自主系统和内分泌系统(Ottaviani等,2016)。在生理指标中,过去十年来,心率变异性(HRV)作为一种生物标志物出现了,特别适合索引持久性认知固有的僵硬性。实际上,HRV中反映的迷走副交感神经抑制的自适应快速应用和撤消被视为灵活的行为常规的动态基础(Porges,2007年)。第一组论文精确地探索了持久性认知与HRV之间的这种联系。特别是有两篇论文结合了以HRV为指标的自主性僵硬度的测量与表征持久性认知的注意/认知僵硬的测量:Gazzellini等。揭示了极易产生令人担忧的思维的人的反应时间(遵循周期性的振荡模式)变化性增加,注意力的反复性下降以及伴随的振荡心率。作者建议,在中心水平上,这些可预测的波动是由属于默认模式网络的中线皮层结构介导的。 Spangler和Friedman为心脏迷走神经的控制提供了相关证据,作为工作记忆资源的可用性指标:焦虑会削弱一个人集中注意力和抑制干扰的能力。最小的工作记忆负荷可以减轻焦虑的这种不利影响,但是更高的工作记忆需求可能会在与焦虑本身相同的程度上损害注意力抑制。 Cropley等。离开实验室,以寻求对持久性认知和HRV的更生态的评估。连续三个晚上进行的综合门诊评估提供了第一个证据,即与工作相关反省水平较低的人相比,有工作反省倾向的人下班后的HRV也较低。 。在另一个截然不同的观点中,HRV被认为是持久性认知的触发因素而不是结果。这是基于这样的假设,即静息HRV较低的人更容易受到压力,因此更有可能从事适应不良的持久性认知类型(如沉思反刍)。此外,适应不良的持久性认知对静息HRV的间接影响可以反馈,使这些相同的个体更容易出现焦虑症状。值得注意的是,适应性的反刍类型(即反射性反刍)不会显着介导这种关联,这表明并非所有反刍都是致病的。 Diamond和Fisher的论文通过探索对这些临床人群和相匹配的对照组的临床诊断访谈的自主神经应激反应,将相似的概念应用于重度抑郁症,广泛性焦虑症(GAD)和社交焦虑症。在访谈中表现出最高的自主神经僵硬程度的人群是高忧虑人群,以及GAD患者,他们具有持久的认知作为诊断需求。作者得出的结论是,共有的转诊特征(尤其是忧虑和抑制)而非诊断合并症是各患者群体之间生理反应的原因。重要的是要注意,反刍的致病作用可以部分归因于其引发健康行为的能力。如Clancy等人进行的荟萃分析所示,该人群处于危险之中(物质使用,饮酒,不健康饮食和吸烟)。令人惊讶的是,这条路线令人担忧。这一贡献优雅地说明了将反刍与疾病联系起来的另一条可行的途径是通过不良的健康行为。Toh和Vasey和Meeten等人。提供有关流程的独特信息

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号