首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Photographic but not line-drawn faces show early perceptual neural sensitivity to eye gaze direction
【24h】

Photographic but not line-drawn faces show early perceptual neural sensitivity to eye gaze direction

机译:摄影但未画线的脸部显示出早期对视线方向的知觉神经敏感性

获取原文
           

摘要

Our brains readily decode facial movements and changes in social attention, reflected in earlier and larger N170 event-related potentials (ERPs) to viewing gaze aversions vs. direct gaze in real faces (Puce et al., 2000 ). In contrast, gaze aversions in line-drawn faces do not produce these N170 differences (Rossi et al., 2014 ), suggesting that physical stimulus properties or experimental context may drive these effects. Here we investigated the role of stimulus-induced context on neurophysiological responses to dynamic gaze. Sixteen healthy adults viewed line-drawn and real faces, with dynamic eye aversion and direct gaze transitions, and control stimuli (scrambled arrays and checkerboards) while continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was recorded. EEG data from 2 temporo-occipital clusters of 9 electrodes in each hemisphere where N170 activity is known to be maximal were selected for analysis. N170 peak amplitude and latency, and temporal dynamics from Event-Related Spectral Perturbations (ERSPs) were measured in 16 healthy subjects. Real faces generated larger N170s for averted vs. direct gaze motion, however, N170s to real and direct gaze were as large as those to respective controls. N170 amplitude did not differ across line-drawn gaze changes. Overall, bilateral mean gamma power changes for faces relative to control stimuli occurred between 150–350 ms, potentially reflecting signal detection of facial motion. Our data indicate that experimental context does not drive N170 differences to viewed gaze changes. Low-level stimulus properties, such as the high sclera/iris contrast change in real eyes likely drive the N170 changes to viewed aversive movements.
机译:我们的大脑很容易解码面部运动和社会关注度的变化,这反映在较早和更大的N170事件相关电位(ERP)中,可以观察到凝视厌恶与真实面孔中的直接凝视(Puce et al。,2000)。相比之下,画线的面孔中的凝视厌恶不会产生这些N170差异(Rossi等人,2014年),这表明物理刺激特性或实验环境可能会驱动这些效应。在这里,我们研究了刺激诱导的情境对动态注视的神经生理反应的作用。 16名健康成年人观察了画线和真实的面孔,并带有动态的眼睛反感和直接的注视过渡,并且在记录连续的脑电图(EEG)活动的同时控制了刺激(扰乱的阵列和棋盘格)。选择来自每个半球中N170活性最大的两个半球的9个电极的颞枕簇的EEG数据进行分析。在16位健康受试者中测量了N170峰幅度和潜伏期以及事件相关光谱扰动(ERSP)的时间动态。对于直视和直视运动,真实面孔会产生较大的N170,但是,针对真实和直接凝视的N170的大小与相应控件的N170一样大。 N170振幅在画线的注视变化中没有差异。总体而言,相对于控制刺激,面部的双边平均伽马强度变化发生在150-350 ms之间,这可能反映了对面部运动的信号检测。我们的数据表明,实验环境不会驱动N170差异来观察视线变化。低水平的刺激属性,例如真实眼睛中的高巩膜/虹膜对比度变化,可能会促使N170发生变化,从而导致观看的厌恶运动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号