...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >The combined effects of neurostimulation and priming on creative thinking. A preliminary tDCS study on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
【24h】

The combined effects of neurostimulation and priming on creative thinking. A preliminary tDCS study on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

机译:神经刺激和启动对创造性思维的综合影响。 tDCS对背外侧前额叶皮层的初步研究

获取原文

摘要

The role of prefrontal cortex (PFC) in influencing creative thinking has been investigated by many researchers who, while succeeding in proving an effective involvement of PFC, reported suggestive but sometimes conflicting results. In order to better understand the relationships between creative thinking and brain activation in a more specific area of the PFC, we explored the role of dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC). We devised an experimental protocol using transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS). The study was based on a 3 (kind of stimulation: anodal vs. cathodal vs. sham) × 2 (priming: divergent vs. convergent) design. Forty-five healthy adults were randomly assigned to one stimulation condition. Participants’ creativity skills were assessed using the Product Improvement subtest from the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). After 20 min of tDCS stimulation, participants were presented with visual images of common objects. Half of the participants were instructed to visualize themselves using the object in an unusual way (divergent priming), whereas the other half were asked to visualize themselves while using the object in a common way (convergent priming). Priming was aimed at inducing participants to adopt different attitudes toward the creative task. Afterwards, participants were asked to describe all of the possible uses of the objects that were presented. Participants’ physiological activation was recorded using a biofeedback equipment. Results showed a significant effect of anodal stimulation that enhanced creative performance, but only after divergent priming. Participants showed lower skin temperature values after cathodal stimulation, a finding which is coherent with studies reporting that, when a task is not creative or creative thinking is not prompted, people show lower levels of arousal. Differences in individual levels of creativity as assessed by the Product Improvement test were not influential. The involvement of DLPFC in creativity has been supported, presumably in association to shift of attention modulated by priming.
机译:许多研究人员已经研究了前额叶皮层(PFC)在影响创造性思维中的作用,他们成功地证明了PFC的有效参与,但报告了提示性但有时相矛盾的结果。为了更好地理解PFC特定区域中创造性思维与大脑激活之间的关系,我们探讨了背外侧PFC(DLPFC)的作用。我们设计了使用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)的实验方案。该研究基于3(刺激类型:阳极vs.阴极vs.假)×2(灌注:发散vs.收敛)设计。将四十五名健康成年人随机分配到一种刺激条件下。参与者的创造力是使用“托兰斯创造性思维测验(TTCT)”中的“产品改进”子测验进行评估的。在tDCS刺激20分钟后,向参与者展示了常见物体的视觉图像。一半的参与者被指示以一种不寻常的方式(分散启动)使用该对象进行可视化,而另一半被要求以一种普通的方式(会聚启动)使用该对象进行可视化。启动旨在引导参与者对创意任务采取不同的态度。之后,要求参与者描述所呈现对象的所有可能用途。使用生物反馈设备记录参与者的生理活动。结果显示,阳极刺激具有显着效果,可增强创造力,但仅在引发不同的条件下才有效。参加者在受到阴极刺激后表现出较低的皮肤温度值,这一发现与研究报告一致,即当任务不具有创造力或没有提出创造性思维时,人们的觉醒水平较低。产品改进测试评估的个人创造力水平的差异没有影响。支持DLPFC参与创造力,大概是与启动引发的注意力转移有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号