...
首页> 外文期刊>Media and Communication >Elicitive Conflict Transformation and New Media: In Search for a Common Ground
【24h】

Elicitive Conflict Transformation and New Media: In Search for a Common Ground

机译:积极的冲突转变与新媒体:寻求共同点

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Advocates of elicitive conflict transformation (ECT) maintain that the parties to a conflict are the most important resource in efforts to render that conflict less violent. According to them, the transformation of the conflict is immanent to the conflict itself. The claim of ECT theorists is that classical conflict resolution has mostly aimed at overcoming a conflict by means of neutral mediation, while conflict transformation is not primarily concerned with terminating a conflict and considers the conflict worker as part of the conflict system. Although ECT is a communication-based model of conflict management and relies on human media, its media-theoretical aspects are not made explicit, raising the question of what role technological media play in the communicative processes that make up ECT techniques. Through an examination of the claimed differences between conflict resolution and conflict transformation, and focusing on the common roots of new media and the elicitive model in systems and cybernetic theory, this paper asks whether any peacebuilding potential of new media could be found in a specific anti-propagandistic quality of distributed technological media. It concludes by looking at any such potential in social media.
机译:主张冲突转换(ECT)的拥护者坚持认为,冲突各方是使冲突减少暴力的最重要资源。他们认为,冲突的转变是冲突本身所固有的。 ECT理论家的主张是,经典的冲突解决方案主要旨在通过中立的调解来克服冲突,而冲突的转变并不主要与终止冲突有关,而是将冲突工作者视为冲突系统的一部分。尽管ECT是基于通信的冲突管理模型,并且依赖于人类媒体,但是其媒体理论方面并未明确,这引发了技术媒体在构成ECT技术的通信过程中扮演什么角色的问题。通过研究宣称的冲突解决与冲突转变之间的差异,并着眼于新媒体的共同根源以及系统和控制论中的启发性模型,本文提出了是否可以在特定的反导体系中找到新媒体的任何建设和平的潜力-分布式技术媒体的宣传质量。本文以社交媒体中的任何此类潜力作为结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号