首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Job-Related Stress in Forensic Interviewers of Children Who Use Therapy Dogs Compared with Facility Dogs or No Dogs
【24h】

Job-Related Stress in Forensic Interviewers of Children Who Use Therapy Dogs Compared with Facility Dogs or No Dogs

机译:使用治疗犬与不使用设施犬或不使用设施犬的儿童的法医访谈人员的工作相关压力

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Sexually abused children providing essential testimony regarding crimes in forensic interviews now sometimes are provided facility dogs or therapy dogs for comfort. Facility dogs are extensively trained to work with forensic interviewers; when using therapy dogs in interviews, volunteers are the dog handlers. Interviews can impact child welfare workers’ mental health, causing secondary traumatic stress. To investigate this stress, data first were gathered on stress retrospectively for when interviewers initially started the job prior to working with a dog, and then currently, from forensic interviewers using a facility dog, a therapy or pet dog, or no dog. These retrospective and Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS) data compared job stress among interviewers of children using: a certified, workplace facility dog(n=16), a volunteer’s trained therapy dog or the interviewer’s pet dog (n=13/3), or no dog (n=198). Retrospective scores of therapy dog and no-dog interviewers’ stress were highest for the first interviewing year one and then declined. Extremely or very stressful retrospective scores differed among the three groups in year one (p < .038), and were significantly elevated for the therapy dog group as compared with the facility dog group (p < .035). All interviewing groups had elevated STSS scores; when compared with other health care groups that have been studied, sub-scores were especially high for Avoidance: a psychological coping mechanism to avoid dealing with a stressor. STSS scores differed among groups (p < .016), primarily due to Avoidance sub-scores (p < .009), reflecting higher Avoidance scores for therapy dog users than no-dog users (p < .009). Facility dog users more consistently used dogs during interviews and conducted more interviews than therapy/pet dog users; both groups favored using dogs. Interviewers currently working with therapy dogs accompanied by their volunteers reported they had experienced heightened stress when they began their jobs; their high stress levels still persisted, indicating lower inherent coping skills and perhaps greater empathy among interviewers who later self-selected to work with therapy dogs. Results reveal extreme avoidant stress for interviewers witnessing children who are suffering, and their differing coping approaches.
机译:现在,有时会为受性虐待的儿童提供法医采访中关于犯罪的基本证词,以提供安慰犬或治疗犬。设施犬接受了广泛的训练,可以与法医采访员合作;在面试中使用治疗犬时,志愿者是犬的处理者。面试会影响儿童福利工作者的心理健康,从而导致继发性创伤压力。为了调查这种压力,首先回顾性收集有关压力的数据,以了解访问者何时开始与狗一起工作之前的工作,然后从法医访问者中使用设施狗,治疗犬或爱犬或不使用狗来进行调查。这些回顾性和继发性创伤压力量表(STSS)数据比较了使用以下方法的儿童访调员的工作压力:使用经过认证的工作场所设施的狗(n = 16),志愿者训练有素的治疗犬或访调员的爱犬(n = 13/3),或没有狗(n = 198)。治疗犬和无犬访调员的回顾性评分在第一年访谈第一年最高,然后下降。在第一年中,三组之间的极度或非常高的回顾性评分有所不同(p <.038),与设施犬组相比,治疗犬组的评分显着升高(p <.035)。所有访谈组的STSS得分均升高;与已研究的其他医疗保健小组相比,避免的子评分特别高:避免与压力源打交道的心理应对机制。各组间的STSS得分有所不同(p <.016),主要是由于回避子得分(p <.009),反映了治疗狗使用者的回避得分要高于非狗使用者(p <.009)。与治疗/宠物狗使用者相比,设施狗使用者在面试期间更一致地使用狗,并且进行了更多的采访;两组都喜欢用狗。目前正在与治疗犬一起工作的访谈员在其志愿者的陪同下报告说,他们开始工作时承受着更大的压力。他们的高压力水平仍然持续存在,这表明较低的内在应对技巧,或者在后来自发选择与治疗犬合作的访问员中,他们的同理心更大。结果表明,面试官亲眼目睹遭受苦难的孩子以及他们不同的应对方法,可以避免巨大的压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号