首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Exploring perspectives on antimicrobial use in livestock: A mixed-methods study of UK pig farmers
【24h】

Exploring perspectives on antimicrobial use in livestock: A mixed-methods study of UK pig farmers

机译:探索家畜使用抗菌药物的观点:英国养猪户的混合方法研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Increasing levels of antimicrobial resistance in human and veterinary medicine have raised concerns over the irresponsible use of antimicrobials. The role of administering antimicrobials in food producing animals most frequently falls to the farmer, therefore it is essential that their use of antimicrobials is both optimal and responsible. This study sought in-depth information on the drivers behind antimicrobial use behaviours and farmer attitudes to responsible use using a mixed-methodological approach. Initially, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposively selected sample of farmers (n=22). A thematic analysis approach was taken to identify key themes from these qualitative data. The generalisability and variation of these themes was then tested on a larger randomly selected sample of pig farmers through a questionnaire study (n=261). The influences behind antimicrobial use were complex with multiple factors drivingdrivers motivating decisions. There was no consensual opinion on what farming systems resulted in either a low or high antimicrobial requirement however, farmers reported that good management practices, low stocking densities and a high health status were factors associated with low antimicrobial use. Farmers expressed desire to avoid the long-term use of in-feed antimicrobials, but identified barriers to discontinuing such behaviours, such as pig morbidity, mortality and economic losses. The high cost of antimicrobials was described as a motivation towards seeking alternative methods of controlling disease to prophylactic use; however, this expense was balanced against the losses from an increased burden of disease. The high financial costs involved in pig production alongside the economic uncertainty of production and pressure from retailers, were identified as limiting the scope for improvements in pig accommodation and facilities which could reduce the antimicrobial requirements on farm. Long-term, sustainable and economically stable relationships between retailers and farmers may allow farmers to make necessary investments in improving management and housing in order to reduce antimicrobial use. Greater use and more widespread deployment of effective vaccinations were highlighted by farmers as being a feasible alternative to antimicrobial use in preventing disease.
机译:人类和兽药中抗菌素耐药性水平的提高引起了人们对不负责任使用抗菌素的担忧。在食品生产动物中,最常给农民施用抗微生物剂的作用,因此,至关重要的是,其抗微生物剂的使用既要优化又要负责任。这项研究寻求有关使用混合方法的抗菌药物使用行为背后的驱动因素和农民对负责任使用态度的深入信息。最初,对有目的的农民样本(n = 22)进行了深入的半结构化访谈。采取了主题分析方法,以从这些定性数据中确定关键主题。然后,通过问卷调查(n = 261)在较大的随机选择的养猪户身上测试了这些主题的普遍性和变异性。抗菌药物使用背后的影响是复杂的,有多种因素驱动驾驶员做出决定。对于哪种耕作系统导致低或高的抗菌素需求尚无共识,但是,农民报告称,良好的管理规范,低放养密度和高健康状况是低抗菌素使用的相关因素。农民表达了避免长期使用饲料中抗菌剂的愿望,但是确定了停止此类行为的障碍,例如猪的发病率,死亡率和经济损失。抗菌药物的高成本被描述为寻求控制疾病预防方法的动机。但是,这笔费用与疾病负担增加所造成的损失相抵消。养猪生产所涉及的高昂财务成本,再加上生产的经济不确定性和零售商的压力,被认为限制了养猪场所和设施的改善范围,从而可能降低农场的抗菌素要求。零售商与农民之间的长期,可持续和经济稳定的关系可以使农民在改善管理和住房方面进行必要的投资,以减少抗菌素的使用。农民强调有效使用疫苗的更多使用和更广泛的部署,是在预防疾病中使用抗菌药物的可行替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号