首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Evaluation of Three Hydration Strategies in Detection Dogs Working in a Hot Environment
【24h】

Evaluation of Three Hydration Strategies in Detection Dogs Working in a Hot Environment

机译:炎热环境下工作犬的三种水化策略评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Physical activity in hot environments can increase the risk of heat stress or heat stroke in dogs. Heat tolerance is influenced by acclimatization to the environment, physical fitness and hydration state. Three common strategies to promote hydration in working dogs are free access to water, oral electrolyte solutions and administration of subcutaneous fluids. None of these methods have been compared for safety or efficacy in a working environment. In a cross-over design, 7 vehicle-screening canines were randomly assigned to each of the 3 hydration strategies during working shifts at the Sarita, TX checkpoint. Physical, behavioral and biochemical parameters were collected before, during and after a work shift (mean 5.7 +/- 0.8 hours). Dogs were given 10 ml/kg oral water (W), 10 ml/kg chicken flavored oral electrolyte solution (OES), or 15 ml/kg of subcutaneous fluids (SQ) initially followed by controlled access to water or OES. The dogs drank 15.61 ± 4.47 ml/kg/hr of water and OES when in the OES group, compared to 7.04 ± 3.42 mls and 5.56 ±4.40 of water, for the water and SQ groups respectively. The median environmental temperature was 84.8?F (29.3?C). The median humidity was 70%. Based on mixed effects linear modeling, dogs in the OES and SQ groups had significantly higher total CO2, and lower packed cell volume and total plasma protein at the end of the day. Creatinine increased a small but significant amount in the SQ group and decreased in the OES group. Searching behaviors were independent of hydration strategy but highly related to the dog specific factors of sex, breed and activity level. Under conditions of controlled activity in moderate heat and humidity, dogs accustomed to the work and the environment were more likely to increase fluid consumption and hydration when provided a flavored OES. Potential benefits of OES and SQ were indirect and no adverse effects were documented for any of the hydration strategies tested.
机译:在高温环境下进行体育锻炼会增加狗的热应激或中暑风险。耐热性受环境适应,身体健康和水合状态的影响。促进工作犬水合作用的三种常见策略是自由饮水,口服电解质溶液和皮下注射液体。在工作环境中,没有比较这些方法的安全性或有效性。在交叉设计中,在德克萨斯州萨里塔检查站的工作班次中,将7个车辆筛查犬随机分配给3种补水策略中的每一种。在轮班之前,期间和之后(平均5.7 +/- 0.8小时)收集身体,行为和生化参数。首先给狗提供10 ml / kg的口服水(W),10 ml / kg的鸡肉味口服电解质溶液(OES)或15 ml / kg的皮下积液(SQ),然后控制饮水或OES。在OES组中,这些狗喝了15.61±4.47 ml / kg / hr的水和OES,而水组和SQ组分别喝了7.04±3.42 mls和5.56±4.40的水。中位环境温度为84.8?F(29.3?C)。中值湿度为70%。基于混合效应线性建模,在一天结束时,OES和SQ组的狗的总CO2显着较高,而包装细胞体积和总血浆蛋白较低。肌酐在SQ组增加少量但显着,而OES组则减少。搜索行为与水合策略无关,但与狗的性别,品种和活动水平等特定因素高度相关。在适度的热量和湿度下活动受控的条件下,习惯了工作和环境的狗在提供调味的OES时更有可能增加体液消耗和水合作用。 OES和SQ的潜在益处是间接的,并且没有记录任何测试的保湿策略的不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号