...
首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical Problems in Engineering: Theory, Methods and Applications >Venture Capital Contracting with Double-Sided Moral Hazard and Fairness Concerns
【24h】

Venture Capital Contracting with Double-Sided Moral Hazard and Fairness Concerns

机译:具有双重道德风险和公平问题的风险投资合同

获取原文
           

摘要

The development of new venture enterprise is the result of joint efforts of entrepreneurs and venture capitalists who collaborate based on complementary resources. In this paper, we analyze a venture capital incentive contracting model in which a venture capitalist interacts with an entrepreneur who is risk neutral and fairness concerned, offering him an equity contract. We solve the venture capitalist’s maximization problem in the presence of double-sided moral hazard. Our results show that fairness concerns change the structure of the optimal contract. More importantly, we show that the solution to the contract regarding the optimal share given to the entrepreneur is nonlinear and is a fixed point between 0 and 1. Further, we simulate the model under the assumption that venture project’s revenue is a Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) function and obtain the following results. (1) When the two efforts are complementary, the venture capitalist’s effort does not monotonically decrease in the share allocated to the entrepreneur, while the entrepreneur’s effort does not monotonically increase in his share. (2) Relative to the benchmark case where the entrepreneur is fairness neutral, the optimal equity share allocated to the fair-minded entrepreneur is larger than 1/2, and as the degree of efforts complementarity increases, the optimal equity share tends to 60%. In this scenario, for a given efforts substitution parameter, the fair-minded entrepreneur provides a higher effort level than the venture capitalist.
机译:新兴风险企业的发展是企业家和风险资本家在互补资源的基础上共同努力的结果。在本文中,我们分析了一种风险投资激励契约模型,其中,风险资本家与风险中立且公平的企业家互动,从而为他提供了股权合同。在存在双重道德风险的情况下,我们解决了风险投资家的最大化问题。我们的结果表明,公平问题改变了最优合同的结构。更重要的是,我们证明了关于授予企业家最佳份额的合同解决方案是非线性的,并且是介于0和1之间的固定点。此外,我们在假设风险投资项目的收入是替代的恒定弹性的前提下模拟了该模型。 (CES)功能并获得以下结果。 (1)当这两种努力互补时,风险资本家的努力不会单调减少分配给企业家的份额,而企业家的努力不会单调增加份额。 (2)相对于企业家是公平中立的基准案例,分配给具有公平思想的企业家的最优股权份额大于1/2,并且随着努力互补程度的提高,最优股权份额趋于60% 。在这种情况下,对于给定的努力替代参数,有头脑的企业家所提供的努力水平要高于风险资本家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号