...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pharmacology >Editorial: Role of Health Economic Data in Policy Making and Reimbursement of New Medical Technologies
【24h】

Editorial: Role of Health Economic Data in Policy Making and Reimbursement of New Medical Technologies

机译:社论:卫生经济数据在决策和新医疗技术报销中的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

This Research Topic was created with a mission to tackle the core challenges for the provision of new medical technologies across the globe considering increasing prices and finite financial resources (Malmstr?m et al., 2013 ; Permanand and Pedersen, 2015 ). A key area certainly includes anti-cancer drugs where prices have increased 10-fold in recent years (Kelly and Smith, 2014 ) leading to concerns with affordability for both health services and patients (Ghinea et al., 2015 ; Tefferi et al., 2015 ). The objective was to reveal some of the hidden underlying causes of unequal access to the medicines as well as the growing proportion of out-of-pocket health spending in many world regions (Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network, 2017 ). In line with the joint efforts of the editors and authors we received an exceptionally high response worldwide. The topic attracted a total of 36 self-standing research submissions out of which 31 ultimately passed external peer review and got published. Base affiliations of the authors spread across academia, pharmaceutical and medical device industry, governmental authorities and clinical medicine. Their home institutions were situated in 15 different countries inclusive of Japan, Israel, Russia, USA, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Austria, Spain (Basque), Malta, Serbia, Poland, Bulgaria, Hungary and Malaysia.In published health economics literature, there is straightforward evidence that accelerated growth of health spending began in the 1960s exceeding the historical 4% GDP threshold (Jakovljevic and Ogura, 2016 ). This phenomenon was noticed early on in mature market economies led by the US, and during the following decades spread to many global regions (Getzen, 2000 ). Health policy makers became increasingly exposed to new harsh challenges in the uneasy task to provide universal health coverage and decent equity of access to medical services. Among the most prominent demand-side issues are population aging (Murata et al., 2010 ), rise of non-communicable diseases (Jakovljevic and Milovanovic, 2015 ), and growing patient expectations. Supply-side causes include improvements in societal welfare (Yamada et al., 1992 ) and living standards, technological innovation in medicine, and continuing rapid urbanization in developing world regions. Experience with implementation of insurance-based risk sharing agreements which aim to facilitate access to new medicine varies substantially (Adamski et al., 2010 ; Ferrario and Kanavos, 2013 ; Ferrario et al., 2017 ). There are growing measures to enhance the prescribing of low cost generics and biosimilars across Europe and other countries without compromising care as the savings can be considerable and used to fund new technologies (Cameron et al., 2012 ; Simoens, 2012 ; Vogler, 2012 ; Godman et al., 2014 ). Published studies have shown that prices of good quality generics can as low as 2% of prepatent loss prices (Woerkom et al., 2012 ). Also, the considerable build-up of workforce capacities and strengthening of primary care and hospital networks contributed to the “supplier induced demand” phenomenon (Richardson and Peacock, 2006 ).There is straightforward historical evidence of long term growth in pharmaceutical and overall health spending both in absolute and GDP % terms worldwide (Dieleman et al., 2017 ). The accumulated constraints resulting from rising costs of care were felt in many areas of clinical medicine even among the richest societies (Kotlikoff and Hagist, 2005 ). Examples of expensive and hardly affordable novel therapeutic areas are orphan drugs indicated to treat rare diseases (Cohen and Felix, 2014 ; Taruscio et al., 2015 ) and targeted biologicals used in autoimmune disorders and cancer; new cancer drugs often with limited health gain (Kantarjian et al., 2013 ; Wild et al., 2016 ). Frequently denied access to even essential generic pharmaceuticals (Jakovljevic et al., 2014 ) is still taking place, in rural and suburban areas of certain countries (e.g., Japan). These difficulties are worsened by the lack of evidence-based resource allocation strategies and less sustainable financing strategies (Jakovljevic et al., 2016 ).Core goals of the Editors of this collection of articles were to cover a growing gap between the medical technology innovation, its dissemination, and cost containment issues. The European Commission has estimated that there is almost 36% room for efficiency gains and costs reductions in most contemporary European health systems (COST Action, 2016 ). So-called “emerging costs for healthcare” have an estimated growth of almost €1,400 billion annually EU wide. Similar issues were clearly recognized in other major global health care markets such as USA (Anderson et al., 2005 ) and Japan (Ogura and Jakovljevic, 2014 ) among the mature ones, and the BRICs led by People's Republic of China among the emerging ones (Jakovljevic, 2015 ). In addition, situation in China is hampered b
机译:制定本研究课题的任务是考虑到价格上涨和有限的财务资源,以解决全球范围内提供新医疗技术的核心挑战(Malmstr?m等人,2013; Permanand和Pedersen,2015)。当然,关键领域包括抗癌药物,近年来价格上涨了10倍(Kelly和Smith,2014年),引起人们对医疗服务和患者负担能力的担忧(Ghinea等,2015; Tefferi等, 2015)。目的是揭示一些无法获得药品的隐性原因,以及许多世界区域自付费用的医疗支出比例不断增长的情况(全球疾病负担健康医疗融资合作伙伴网络,2017年)。在编辑和作者的共同努力下,我们在全球范围内收到了异常高的反响。该主题总共吸引了36项独立研究论文,其中31篇最终通过了外部同行评审并发表。作者的基本隶属关系遍布学术界,制药和医疗器械行业,政府机构和临床医学。他们的总部设在15个不同的国家/地区,包括日本,以色列,俄罗斯,美国,德国,意大利,荷兰,奥地利,西班牙(巴斯克),马耳他,塞尔维亚,波兰,保加利亚,匈牙利和马来西亚。有直接的证据表明,医疗支出的加速增长始于1960年代,超过了历史上4%的GDP阈值(Jakovljevic和Ogura,2016年)。这种现象早在以美国为首的成熟市场经济体中就已注意到,并在随后的几十年中传播到许多全球地区(Getzen,2000年)。在提供全民健康覆盖和公平获得医疗服务的艰巨任务中,卫生政策制定者越来越面临新的严峻挑战。需求方面最突出的问题是人口老龄化(Murata等人,2010年),非传染性疾病的上升(Jakovljevic和Milovanovic,2015年)以及患者期望值的提高。供应方面的原因包括社会福利的改善(Yamada等人,1992年)和生活水平的提高,医学技术的创新,以及发展中国家地区持续的快速城市化。旨在促进获取新药的基于保险的风险分担协议的实施经验差异很大(Adamski等,2010; Ferrario和Kanavos,2013; Ferrario等,2017)。在欧洲和其他国家,有越来越多的措施可以在不影响医疗保健的情况下加强对低成本仿制药和生物仿制药的处方,因为节省下来的钱可观,并可用于资助新技术(Cameron等人,2012; Simoens,2012; Vogler,2012; Amsterdam,2012)。 Godman et al。,2014)。公开的研究表明,优质仿制药的价格可低至专利损失价格的2%(Woerkom等,2012)。同样,劳动力能力的显着提高以及基层医疗和医院网络的加强也导致了“供应商诱导的需求”现象(Richardson和Peacock,2006年)。有直接的历史证据表明,药品和整体卫生支出会长期增长。无论是绝对数字还是GDP百分比(Dieleman et al。,2017)。在临床医学的许多领域,甚至在最富裕的社会中,也都感受到了由护理费用上涨引起的累积制约(Kotlikoff and Hagist,2005)。昂贵且难以负担的新型治疗领域的例子有:孤儿药物(可治疗罕见疾病)(Cohen和Felix,2014年; Taruscio等人,2015年)以及用于自身免疫性疾病和癌症的靶向生物。新的癌症药物通常会限制健康的发展(Kantarjian等,2013; Wild等,2016)。在某些国家(例如日本)的农村和郊区,人们甚至拒绝获得甚至必不可少的通用药品(Jakovljevic等,2014)。这些困难由于缺乏基于证据的资源分配策略和可持续性较差的筹资策略而变得更加严重(Jakovljevic et al。,2016)。本系列文章的编辑的核心目标是弥补医疗技术创新之间日益扩大的差距,它的传播和成本控制问题。欧盟委员会估计,在大多数当代欧洲卫生系统中,效率提高和成本降低的空间几乎达到36%(COST Action,2016年)。整个欧盟范围内,所谓的“医疗保健新兴成本”估计每年增长近1.4万亿欧元。在其他主要的全球医疗保健市场中,类似的问题在成熟的美国,美国(Anderson等人,2005年)和日本(Ogura和Jakovljevic,2014年)以及由中国领导的金砖四国中也得到了公认。 (Jakovljevic,2015年)。此外,中国的局势受到阻碍

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号