...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Nutrition >Characterizing ultra-processed foods by energy density, nutrient density and cost
【24h】

Characterizing ultra-processed foods by energy density, nutrient density and cost

机译:通过能量密度,营养成分密度和成本表征超加工食品

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The NOVA food classification scheme divides foods into ultra-processed, processed, unprocessed, and culinary ingredients. Ultra-processed foods contribute 60% of energy to diets in the US. Objective: To characterize ultra-processed foods by energy density, nutrient density, and monetary cost. Methods: The 384 component foods of Fred Hutch (FHCRC) food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), were assigned to 4 NOVA categories and to 7 USDA MyPyramid food groups. Energy density was kcal/g . Nutrient density was measured using the Nutrient Rich Food index NRF9.3. Food prices were collected in local supermarkets from 2004 to2016. Analyses examined time trends in food prices by NOVA category and by USDA food group.. Results: The ultra-processed classification captured mostly grains (91%), fats and sweets (73%), dairy (71%), and beans, nuts and seeds (70%), but only 36% of meat, poultry and fish, 26% of vegetables, and 20% of fruit. Compared to unprocessed foods, ultra-processed foods had lower nutrient density (NRF9.3 per 100kcal: 21.2 vs. 108.5) ,higher energy density (mean (SD): 2.2 vs 1.10 in kcal/g), and lower per calorie cost (0.55 vs. 1.45 in $/100 kcal). Ultra-processed foods did not increase in price as much as unprocessed foods over the 12 year period.. Conclusion: Ultra-processed foods tend to be energy-dense, low-cost, and nutrient-poor. Low energy cost could be one mechanism linking ultra-processed foods with negative health outcomes. Food-based Dietary Guidelines may need to address food processing in relation to economic aspects of food choice.
机译:背景:NOVA食品分类方案将食品分为超加工,加工,未加工和烹饪成分。在美国,超加工食品为饮食贡献了60%以上的能量。目的:通过能量密度,营养成分密度和货币成本来表征超加工食品。方法:将弗雷德·哈奇(FHCRC)食物频率调查表(FFQ)的384种成分食品分为4个NOVA类别和7个USDA MyPyramid食物组。能量密度为kcal / g。使用营养丰富食品指数NRF9.3测量营养密度。从2004年到2016年在当地的超级市场收集食品价格。分析按NOVA类别和USDA食品组分类的食品价格时间趋势。结果:超加工分类主要捕获谷物(91%),脂肪和甜食(73%),乳制品(71%)以及豆类,坚果种子(70%),但只有36%的肉,禽和鱼,26%的蔬菜和20%的水果。与未加工食品相比,超加工食品营养成分密度较低(每100kcal NRF9.3:21.2与108.5),能量密度较高(平均值(SD):kcal / g 2.2与1.10),每卡路里成本较低( $ 100大卡中的0.55比1.45)。在过去的12年中,超加工食品的价格涨幅不如未加工食品。.结论:超加工食品往往能量密集,价格低廉且营养贫乏。能源成本低可能是将超加工食品与负面健康结果联系起来的一种机制。以食物为基础的饮食指南可能需要处理与食物选择的经济方面有关的食物加工。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号