首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Oncology >Treatment Plan Technique and Quality for Single-Isocenter Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy of Multiple Lung Lesions with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy or Intensity-Modulated Radiosurgery
【24h】

Treatment Plan Technique and Quality for Single-Isocenter Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy of Multiple Lung Lesions with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy or Intensity-Modulated Radiosurgery

机译:容积调制弧光治疗或强度调制放射治疗多中心病变单等位立体定向消融放射治疗的治疗计划技术和质量

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study is to provide a practical approach to the planning technique and evaluation of plan quality for the multi-lesion, single-isocenter stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of the lung. Eleven patients with two or more lung lesions underwent single-isocenter volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiosurgery or IMRS. All plans were normalized to the target maximum dose. For each plan, all targets were treated to the same dose. Plan conformity and dose gradient were maximized with dose-control tuning structures surrounding targets. For comparison, multi-isocenter plans were retrospectively created for four patients. Conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), and gradient distance (GD) were calculated for each plan. V5, V10, and V20 of the lung and organs at risk (OARs) were collected. Treatment time and total monitor units (MUs) were also recorded. One patient had four lesions and the remainder had two lesions. Six patients received VMAT and five patients received intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS). For those treated with VMAT, two patients received 3-arc VMAT and four received 2-arc VMAT. For those treated with IMRS, two patients were treated with 10 and 11 beams, respectively, and the rest received 12 beams. Prescription doses ranged from 30 to 54?Gy in three to five fractions. The median prescribed isodose line was 84% (range: 80–86%). The median maximum dose was 57.1?Gy (range: 35.7–65.1?Gy). The mean combined PTV was 49.57?cm~(3)(range: 14.90–87.38?cm~(3)). For single-isocenter plans, the median CI was 1.15 (range: 0.97–1.53). The median HI was 1.19 (range: 1.16–1.28). The median GI was 4.60 (range: 4.16–7.37). The median maximum radiation dose (D_(max)) to total lung was 55.6?Gy (range: 35.7–62.0?Gy). The median mean radiation dose to the lung (D_(mean)) was 4.2?Gy (range: 1.1–9.3?Gy). The median lung V5 was 18.7% (range: 3.8–41.3%). There was no significant difference in CI, HI, GI, GD, V5, V10, and V20 (lung, heart, trachea, esophagus, and spinal cord) between single-isocenter and multi-isocenter plans. This multi-lesion, single-isocenter lung SABR planning technique demonstrated excellent plan quality and clinical efficiency and is recommended for radiosurgical treatment of two or more lung targets for well-suited patients.
机译:这项研究的目的是为肺的多病灶,单等中心立体定向消融放疗(SABR)提供计划技术和计划质量评估的实用方法。患有两个或多个肺部病变的11例患者接受了单等中心容积调制弧光治疗(VMAT)放射外科手术或IMRS。将所有计划标准化为目标最大剂量。对于每个计划,所有目标均按相同剂量进行治疗。通过围绕目标的剂量控制调整结构,可最大程度地提高计划的一致性和剂量梯度。为了进行比较,回顾性地为四位患者创建了多等中心计划。计算每个计划的合格指数(CI),均匀指数(HI),梯度指数(GI)和梯度距离(GD)。收集肺和风险器官(OAR)的V5,V10和V20。还记录了治疗时间和总监测单位(MU)。一名患者有四个病变,其余患者有两个病变。 6例患者接受了VMAT,5例患者接受了调强放射外科(IMRS)。对于那些接受VMAT治疗的患者,两名患者接受了3弧形VMAT,四名接受了2弧形VMAT。对于那些用IMRS治疗的患者,两名患者分别接受了10束和11束治疗,其余患者接受了12束治疗。处方剂量范围为30至54?Gy,分为三至五个部分。处方中的等剂量线中位数为84%(范围:80–86%)。中位数最大剂量为57.1?Gy(范围:35.7–65.1?Gy)。平均PTV为49.57?cm〜(3)(范围:14.90-87.38?cm〜(3))。对于单等中心计划,CI的中位数为1.15(范围:0.97-1.53​​)。 HI中位数为1.19(范围:1.16-1.28)。胃肠道中位值为4.60(范围:4.16-7.37)。整个肺部的最大中值放射剂量(D_(max))为55.6?Gy(范围:35.7–62.0?Gy)。肺部平均放射剂量(D_(平均值))为4.2?Gy(范围:1.1–9.3?Gy)。肺V5的中位数为18.7%(范围:3.8–41.3%)。在单等中心和多等中心计划之间,CI,HI,GI,GD,V5,V10和V20(肺,心脏,气管,食道和脊髓)没有显着差异。这种多病灶,单等中心肺SABR计划技术显示出出色的计划质量和临床效率,建议将其用于两个或多个适合目标患者的肺靶的放射外科治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号