首页> 外文期刊>Matematika >Comparison between VAR, GSTAR, FFNN-VAR and FFNN-GSTAR Models for Forecasting Oil Production
【24h】

Comparison between VAR, GSTAR, FFNN-VAR and FFNN-GSTAR Models for Forecasting Oil Production

机译:用于预测石油产量的VAR,GSTAR,FFNN-VAR和FFNN-GSTAR模型之间的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Monthly data about oil production at several drilling wells is an example of spatio-temporal data. The aim of this research is to propose nonlinear spatio-temporal model, i.e. Feedforward Neural Network - Vector Autoregressive (FFNN-VAR) and FFNN - Generalized Space-Time Autoregressive (FFNN-GSTAR), and compare their forecast accuracy to linear spatio-temporal model, i.e. VAR and GSTAR. These spatio-temporal models are proposed and applied for forecasting monthly oil production data at three drilling wells in East Java, Indonesia. There are 60 observations that be divided to two parts, i.e. the first 50 observations for training data and the last 10 observations for testing data. The results show that FFNN-GSTAR(1 1 ) and FFNN-VAR(1) as nonlinear spatio-temporal models tend to give more accurate forecast than VAR(1) and GSTAR(1 1 ) as linear spatio-temporal models. Moreover, further research about nonlinear spatio-temporal models based on neural networks and GSTAR is needed for developing new hybrid models that could improve the forecast accuracy.
机译:有关多个钻井的石油产量的月度数据是时空数据的一个示例。本研究的目的是提出非线性时空模型,即前馈神经网络-向量自回归(FFNN-VAR)和FFNN-广义时空自回归(FFNN-GSTAR),并将其预测精度与线性时空进行比较模型,即VAR和GSTAR。提出了这些时空模型,并将其用于预测印度尼西亚东爪哇的三口钻井的每月石油产量数据。有60个观察结果分为两个部分,即前50个观察数据用于训练数据,后10个观察数据用于测试数据。结果表明,作为非线性时空模型的FFNN-GSTAR(1 1)和FFNN-VAR(1)倾向于比作为线性时空模型的VAR(1)和GSTAR(1 1)给出更准确的预测。此外,需要进一步研究基于神经网络和GSTAR的非线性时空模型,以开发能够提高预测准确性的新混合模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号