首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pharmacology >The Cost-Effectiveness of an Intervention Program to Enhance Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication in Comparison With Usual Care in Community Pharmacies
【24h】

The Cost-Effectiveness of an Intervention Program to Enhance Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication in Comparison With Usual Care in Community Pharmacies

机译:与社区药房中的常规护理相比,增强对降压药物依从性的干预计划的成本效果

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Hypertension is considered an important public health issue. Inadequate disease management and non-adherence to antihypertensive medication may result in suboptimal clinical outcomes thereby imposing a financial burden on society. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a patient-tailored, pharmacist-led intervention program aimed to enhance adherence to antihypertensive medication in comparison with usual care. Materials and Methods: An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with 9-months follow-up among 170 patients using antihypertensive medication. Effect outcomes included self-reported adherence (MARS-5), beliefs about medicines (BMQ Concern and Necessity scales) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Missing cost and effect data were imputed using multiple imputation. Bootstrapping was used to estimate uncertainty around the cost-differences and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves were estimated. Results: There were no significant differences in costs or effects between the intervention program and usual care. The probability of cost-effectiveness of the intervention in comparison with usual care was 0.27 at a willingness-to-pay value of 0 €/unit of effect gained. At a willingness-to-pay value of 20,000 €/unit of effect gained, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 0.70, 0.27, 0.64, 0.87, and 0.36 for the continuous MARS-5 score, dichotomized MARS-5 score, BMQ Concern scale, BMQ Necessity scale and QALYs, respectively. Discussion: In patients with hypertension, the patient-tailored, pharmacist-led intervention program to enhance medication adherence was not considered cost-effective as compared to usual care with regard to self-reported medication adherence, beliefs about medicines and QALYs.
机译:简介:高血压被认为是重要的公共卫生问题。疾病管理不充分和不坚持服用降压药可能导致临床效果欠佳,从而给社会造成经济负担。这项研究评估了由患者量身定制,由药剂师主导的干预计划的成本效益,该计划旨在与常规护理相比,增强对降压药物的依从性。材料和方法:在一项实用的随机对照试验的同时,对170名使用降压药的患者进行了为期9个月的随访,进行了经济评估。效果结果包括自我报告的依从性(MARS-5),对药物的信念(BMQ关注度和必要性量表)和质量调整的生命年(QALY)。成本是从社会角度衡量的。缺失的成本和效果数据是使用多重插补估算的。自举法用于估计成本差异和成本效益比增加方面的不确定性。估算了成本效益平面和可接受性曲线。结果:干预计划和常规护理之间在成本或效果方面无显着差异。与通常护理相比,干预的成本效益概率为0.27,支付意愿值为0€/单位效果。如果获得的愿意付款值为20,000欧元/效果单位,则连续MARS-5评分,二等分MARS-5评分和BMQ关注度的成本效益概率分别为0.70、0.27、0.64、0.87和0.36规模,BMQ必要性规模和QALY。讨论:在高血压患者中,与患者自我报告的药物依从性,对药物的信念和QALYs的常规护理相比,由患者量身定制的,由药剂师主导的干预计划提高药物依从性的措施与常规护理相比并不具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号