首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pharmacology >Cholesteryl ester transfer protein: ace of spades, queen of hearts, or the joker?
【24h】

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein: ace of spades, queen of hearts, or the joker?

机译:胆固醇酯转移蛋白:黑桃王牌,红桃皇后还是小丑?

获取原文
           

摘要

Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) catalyzes the transfer of CEs from high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) to triglyceride-rich and low-density lipoproteins (LDLs). The hypothesis that CETP inhibition will prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) was based on the fact that low activity increases HDL cholesterol and decreases LDL cholesterol. Early reports that CETP gene transfer increased atherosclerosis in mice, and that CETP inhibition reduced lesions in cholesterol-fed rabbits fuelled enthusiasm for the approach. Although some cautioned that the development of CETP inhibitors was premature owing to uncertainties about their impact on the remodeling of HDLs and reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) in humans (Fielding and Havel, 1996 ), drug discovery programmes proceeded. Two parallel research tracks then emerged. While industry progressed to clinical studies, academics sought to clarify the relations of CETP activity to RCT and atherosclerosis. Two drugs reached Phase 3 clinical trials. However, ILLUMINATE was terminated when torcetrapib was found to have had increased CVD. Five years later, Dal-OUTCOMES was aborted when it was evident dalcetrapib was not conferring any benefit.After reviewing the literature up to May 2014, Miller ( 2014 ) concluded that CETP inhibition is more likely to increase CVD than prevent it, and was of the opinion that ongoing trials should be stopped. Since then several further pertinent studies have been published. They include four meta-analyses of the Taq1B polymorphism of the CETP gene. Cao et al. ( 2014 ) concluded that B2B2 homozygotes (low CETP activity, high HDL cholesterol) have a lower risk of myocardial infarction (MI) than B1B1 subjects. Using Mendelian randomization, Wu et al. ( 2014 ) found the B2 allele to be associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). However, another Mendelian randomization (Niu and Qi, 2015 ) found the B2 allele to be associated with a higher risk of CVD than the B1 allele. In this context, an earlier meta-analysis by Dullaart and Sluiter ( 2008 ) is of interest. These authors found that B2B2 carriers were less frequent among cases drawn from samples at high CVD risk than among cases drawn from population-based samples. Furthermore, in the latter case the odds ratio for CVD was 1.45 (95% CI: 1.07–1.95) in B2B2 relative to B1B1, while in the former it was 0.84 (0.74–0.96), suggesting that in the general population the B2 allele is actually associated with higher CVD risk in spite of the higher HDL cholesterol. Regieli et al. ( 2008 ) had come to a similar conclusion in the REGRESS study. After following 812 men with CHD on statins for 10 years, the B2 allele was associated with a hazard ratio for CVD death of 1.59 ( P = 0.01) despite the expected low CETP activity and high HDL cholesterol.Four additional meta-analyses looked at the impact of CETP inhibitors on CVD risk as part of larger studies of the effects of HDL cholesterol-raising agents in patients taking statins. All four concluded that the trials have not demonstrated a beneficial effect (Keene et al., 2014 ; Hourcade-Potelleret et al., 2015 ; Ip et al., 2015 ; Verdoia et al., 2015 ). In clinical studies, Gu et al. ( 2014 ) reported that although the A allele of the ?629°C/A polymorphism of the CETP gene was associated with a lower plasma CETP concentration than the C allele, it had not reduced CVD events in patients taking atorvastatin. Kastelein et al. ( 2015 ) observed no significant effect of anacetrapib on CVD incidence (four events vs. zero in the treated and placebo groups, respectively) during 12 months of follow-up in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia already on lipid-lowering treatment. Scharnagl et al. ( 2014 ) confirmed earlier reports that human plasma samples with low CETP concentrations were less effective in promoting cholesterol efflux from cultured macrophages than samples with high concentrations. In animal studies, Kühnast et al. ( 2015 ) found that anacetrapib reduced atherosclerosis in APOE~(*)3Leiden.CETP transgenic mice. Briand et al. ( 2014 ) compared anacetrapib with dalcetrapib in hamsters, a species with natural CETP. In normal animals, neither drug at doses equipotent for CETP inhibition (by 60%) had any effect on macrophage-to-feces RCT, although they did lower equally the fractional clearance rate of HDL-CE. In dyslipidaemic animals, anacetrapib increased RCT, whereas an equipotent dose of dalcetrapib reduced it. Liu et al. ( 2015 ) found that inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II (Topo II) by etoposide, tenipooside or Topo II siRNA increased CETP gene expression and CETP secretion in HepG2 cells. When given to CETP transgenic mice, teniposide induced CETP expression in the liver, and increased macrophage-to-feces RCT to a greater degree than in wild-type mice with no CETP. Using a computer model of lipoprotein metabolism to analyze the on/off kinetics of the short-acting potent CETP inhibitor RG7232, Lu et al. (
机译:血浆胆固醇酯转移蛋白(CETP)催化CE从高密度脂蛋白(HDL)到富含甘油三酸酯和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)的转移。 CETP抑制将预防心血管疾病(CVD)的假设是基于低活性会增加HDL胆固醇并降低LDL胆固醇的事实。早期的报道表明,CETP基因转移会增加小鼠的动脉粥样硬化,而CETP抑制作用会减少胆固醇喂养的兔子的病变,从而激发了人们对该方法的热情。尽管有人警告说,由于CETP抑制剂对人类HDLs重塑和胆固醇逆向转运(RCT)的影响尚不确定,因此开发CETP抑制剂还为时过早(Fielding和Havel,1996)。然后出现了两个平行的研究轨道。在工业进入临床研究的同时,学者们试图阐明CETP活性与RCT和动脉粥样硬化的关系。两种药物已进入3期临床试验。但是,当torcetrapib发现CVD升高时,ILLUMINATE终止。五年后,当dalcetrapib不能带来任何益处时,Dal-OUTCOMES被中止.2014年5月对文献进行回顾后,Miller(2014)得出结论认为,CETP抑制比起预防作用更可能增加CVD的发生,并且认为应停止正在进行的审判。从那以后,又发表了一些相关的研究。它们包括CETP基因Taq1B多态性的四个荟萃分析。曹等。 (2014年)得出的结论是,与B1B1受试者相比,B2B2纯合子(低CETP活性,高HDL胆固醇)具有更低的心肌梗死(MI)风险。 Wu等使用孟德尔随机法。 (2014)发现B2等位基因与冠心病(CHD)的风险较低有关。但是,另一项孟德尔随机化方法(Niu和Qi,2015年)发现,B2等位基因比B1等位基因有更高的CVD风险。在这种情况下,Dullaart和Sluiter(2008)的早期荟萃分析引起了人们的兴趣。这些作者发现,从具有高CVD风险的样本中提取的病例中,B2B2携带者的频率要比从基于人群的样本中提取的病例少。此外,在后一种情况下,相对于B1B1,B2B2中CVD的优势比为1.45(95%CI:1.07–1.95),而在前者中则为0.84(0.74–0.96),表明在一般人群中B2等位基因尽管HDL胆固醇较高,但实际上与较高的CVD风险有关。 Regieli等。 (2008年)在REGRESS研究中得出了类似的结论。在对812名他汀类药物的冠心病男性随访10年后,尽管预期CETP活性较低和HDL胆固醇较高,但B2等位基因与CVD死亡的危险比仍为1.59(P = 0.01).4次其他荟萃分析CETP抑制剂对CVD风险的影响,这是对服用他汀类药物的HDL胆固醇升高剂作用进行更大规模研究的一部分。所有这四个结论都表明,这些试验并未显示出有益的效果(Keene等,2014; Hourcade-Potelleret等,2015; Ip等,2015; Verdoia等,2015)。在临床研究中,Gu等。 (2014)报道,尽管CETP基因的?629°C / A多态性的A等位基因与血浆CETP浓度比C等位基因低有关,但服用阿托伐他汀的患者并没有减少CVD事件。 Kastelein等。 (2015年)在已经接受降脂治疗的杂合性家族性高胆固醇血症患者的随访中,观察到anacetrapib对CVD发生率无明显影响(在四个事件中,治疗组和安慰剂组为零,分别为零和零); Scharnagl等。 (2014年)证实了较早的报道,低CETP浓度的人血浆样品在促进培养巨噬细胞胆固醇外排方面不如高浓度样品有效。在动物研究中,Kühnast等人。 (2015)发现anacetrapib减少了APOE〜(*)3Leiden.CETP转基因小鼠的动脉粥样硬化。 Briand等。 (2014)比较了在具有自然CETP的仓鼠中anacetrapib和dalcetrapib的关系。在正常动物中,两种药物均不能等效地抑制CETP(60%),对巨噬细胞-粪便RCT没有任何影响,尽管它们确实降低了HDL-CE的清除率。在血脂异常动物中,anacetrapib增加了RCT,而等剂量的dalcetrapib降低了RCT。刘等。 (2015)发现依托泊苷,替尼泊苷或Topo II siRNA对DNA拓扑异构酶II(Topo II)的抑制作用增加了HepG2细胞中CETP基因的表达和CETP的分泌。与没有CETP的野生型小鼠相比,当给予CETP转基因小鼠时,替尼泊苷可诱导肝脏中CETP表达,并使巨噬细胞-粪便RCT的增加程度更大。 Lu等人使用脂蛋白​​代谢计算机模型来分析短效强效CETP抑制剂RG7232的开/关动力学。 (

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号