首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Neurology >Predicting Prognosis of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH): Performance of ICH Score Is Not Improved by Adding Oral Anticoagulant Use
【24h】

Predicting Prognosis of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH): Performance of ICH Score Is Not Improved by Adding Oral Anticoagulant Use

机译:预测脑出血(ICH)的预后:增加口服抗凝药的使用不会改善ICH评分的表现

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) score is a commonly used prognostic model for 30-day mortality in ICH, based on five independent predictors (ICH volume, location, Glasgow Coma Scale, age, and intraventricular extension). Use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) is also associated with mortality but was not considered in the ICH score. We investigated (a) whether the predictive performance of ICH score is similar in OAC-ICH and non-OAC-ICH and (b) whether addition of OAC use to the ICH score increases the prognostic performance of the score. Methods We retrospectively selected all consecutive adult non-traumatic ICH cases (three hospitals, region South-Limburg, the Netherlands 2004–2009). Mortality at 30?days was recorded. Using univariable and multivariable logistic regression, association between OAC use and 30-day mortality was tested. Then (a) we computed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for ICH score and determined the area under the curve (AUC) in OAC-ICH and non-OAC-ICH. Then (b) we created a New ICH score by adding OAC use to the ICH score. We calculated correlation between 30-day mortality and ICH score, respectively, New ICH score using Spearman correlation test. We computed ROC curves and calculated the AUC. Results We analyzed 1,232 cases, 282 (22.9%) were OAC related ICH. Overall, 30-day mortality was 39.3%. OAC use was independently associated with 30-day mortality (OR 2.09, 95% CI, 1.48–2.95; p ?
机译:背景脑出血(ICH)评分是ICH中30天死亡率的常用预后模型,基于五个独立的预测因子(ICH量,位置,格拉斯哥昏迷量表,年龄和脑室内扩张)。口服抗凝剂(OAC)的使用也与死亡率有关,但ICH评分中并未考虑使用。我们调查了(a)在OAC-ICH和非OAC-ICH中ICH评分的预测性能是否相似,以及(b)在ICH评分中添加OAC是否会增加该评分的预后性能。方法我们回顾性选择了所有连续的成人非创伤性ICH病例(荷兰南林堡地区的三家医院,2004-2009年)。记录30天的死亡率。使用单变量和多变量logistic回归,测试了OAC使用与30天死亡率之间的关联。然后(a)我们计算了ICH分数的接收机工作特性(ROC)曲线,并确定了OAC-ICH和非OAC-ICH中曲线下的面积(AUC)。然后(b)我们通过在ICH分数中添加OAC使用来创建新的ICH分数。我们使用Spearman相关检验分别计算了30天死亡率与ICH评分,新ICH评分之间的相关性。我们计算了ROC曲线并计算了AUC。结果我们分析了1,232例病例,其中282例(22.9%)是与OAC相关的ICH。总体而言,30天死亡率为39.3%。 OAC的使用与30天死亡率(OR 2.09,95%CI,1.48-2.95; p <0.001)独立相关,并通过ICH评分的五个预测因子进行了校正。非OAC-ICH(AUC 0.840)的ICH评分稍好于OAC-ICH(AUC 0.816)的ICH评分,但这种差异并不显着(p = 0.39)。 ICH评分和新ICH评分均与30天死亡率显着相关(rho为0.58,p <0.001,和0.59,p <0.001)。 ICH评分的AUC为0.837,新ICH评分的AUC为0.840。这种差异并不明显。结论ICH评分是预测使用OAC和不使用OAC的患者30天死亡率的有用工具。尽管OAC的使用是30天死亡率的独立预测因素,但在现有ICH评分中增加OAC的使用不会增加该评分的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号