首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology >A Biomechanical Comparison of Proportional Electromyography Control to Biological Torque Control Using a Powered Hip Exoskeleton
【24h】

A Biomechanical Comparison of Proportional Electromyography Control to Biological Torque Control Using a Powered Hip Exoskeleton

机译:比例肌电图控制与使用电动髋关节外骨骼进行生物扭矩控制的生物力学比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Despite a large increase in robotic exoskeleton research, there are few studies that have examined human performance with different control strategies on the same exoskeleton device. Direct comparison studies are needed to determine how users respond to different types of control. The purpose of this study was to compare user performance using a robotic hip exoskeleton with two different controllers: a controller that targeted a biological hip torque profile and a proportional myoelectric controller. Methods We tested both control approaches on 10 able-bodied subjects using a pneumatically powered hip exoskeleton. The state machine controller targeted a biological hip torque profile. The myoelectric controller used electromyography (EMG) of lower limb muscles to produce a proportional control signal for the hip exoskeleton. Each subject performed two 30-minute exoskeleton walking trials (1.0 m/s) using each controller and a 10-minute trial with the exoskeleton unpowered. During each trial, we measured subjects’ metabolic cost of walking, lower limb EMG profiles, and joint kinematics and kinetics (torques and powers) using a force treadmill and motion capture. Results Compared to unassisted walking in the exoskeleton, myoelectric control reduced metabolic cost by 13% (p=0.005) and biological hip torque control reduced metabolic cost by 7%. Subjects reduced muscle activity relative to the unpowered condition for a greater number of lower limb muscles using myoelectric control compared to the biological hip torque control. More subjects subjectively preferred the myoelectric controller to the biological hip torque control. Conclusions Myoelectric control had more advantages (metabolic cost and muscle activity reduction) compared to a controller that targeted a biological torque profile for walking with a robotic hip exoskeleton. However, these results were obtained with a single exoskeleton device with specific control configurations while level walking at a single speed. Further testing on different exoskeleton hardware and with more varied experimental protocols, such as testing over multiple types of terrain, is needed to fully elucidate the potential benefits of myoelectric control for exoskeleton technology.
机译:背景技术尽管机器人外骨骼的研究大量增加,但是很少有研究在相同的外骨骼设备上使用不同的控制策略来检查人体性能。需要直接比较研究来确定用户如何响应不同类型的控件。这项研究的目的是比较机器人髋关节外骨骼与两种不同控制器的用户表现:针对生物髋部扭矩曲线的控制器和成比例的肌电控制器。方法我们使用气动髋关节外骨骼对10名健壮受试者进行了两种控制方法的测试。状态机控制器的目标是生物学的髋部扭矩曲线。肌电控制器使用下肢肌肉的肌电图(EMG)为髋关节外骨骼产生比例控制信号。每个受试者使用每个控制器进行两次30分钟的外骨骼步行试验(1.0 m / s),在不使用外骨骼的情况下进行10分钟的试验。在每项试验中,我们使用跑步机和运动捕捉器测量了受试者的步行新陈代谢成本,下肢EMG轮廓以及关节运动学和动力学(扭矩和力量)。结果与外骨骼无助行走相比,肌电控制可将代谢成本降低13%(p = 0.005),而生物髋部扭力控制可将代谢成本降低7%。相较于无动力状态,与生物髋部扭矩控制相比,使用肌电控制的受试者相对于无动力状态减少了更多的下肢肌肉。主观上,更多的受试者更喜欢肌电控制器而不是生物髋部扭矩控制。结论与以机器人髋关节外骨骼行走的生物扭矩曲线为目标的控制器相比,肌电控制具有更多的优势(代谢成本和肌肉活动减少)。但是,这些结果是通过具有特定控制配置的单个外骨骼设备同时以单速行走时获得的。为了充分阐明肌电控制对外骨骼技术的潜在好处,需要在不同的外骨骼硬件上进行进一步测试,并使用更多不同的实验协议,例如在多种类型的地形上进行测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号