首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Which intervention is better for malaria vector control: insecticide mixture long-lasting insecticidal nets or standard pyrethroid nets combined with indoor residual spraying?
【24h】

Which intervention is better for malaria vector control: insecticide mixture long-lasting insecticidal nets or standard pyrethroid nets combined with indoor residual spraying?

机译:哪种干预措施对控制疟疾媒介更好:杀虫剂混合物持久的杀虫网或标准拟除虫菊酯网结合室内残留喷雾?

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundMalaria control today is threatened by widespread insecticide resistance in vector populations. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of a mixture of unrelated insecticides for indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LNs) or as a combination of interventions for improved vector control and insecticide resistance management. Studies investigating the efficacy of these different strategies are necessary. MethodsThe efficacy of Interceptor? G2 LN, a newly developed LN treated with a mixture of chlorfenapyr (a pyrrole) and alpha-cypermethrin (a pyrethroid), was compared to a combined chlorfenapyr IRS and Interceptor? LN (a standard alpha-cypermethrin LN) intervention in experimental huts in Cove Southern Benin, against wild, free-flying, pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae s.l. A direct comparison was also made with a pyrethroid-only net (Interceptor? LN) alone and chorfenapyr IRS alone. ResultsWHO resistance bioassays performed during the trial demonstrated a pyrethroid resistance frequency of >90% in the wild An. gambiae s.l. from the Cove hut site. Mortality in the control (untreated net) hut was 5%. Mortality with Interceptor? LN (24%) was lower than with chlorfenapyr IRS alone (59%, P ? LN and chlorfenapyr IRS intervention and the mixture net (Interceptor? G2 LN) provided significantly higher mortality rates (73 and 76%, respectively) and these did not differ significantly between both treatments (P?=?0.15). Interceptor LN induced 46% blood-feeding inhibition compared to the control untreated net, while chlorfenapyr IRS alone provided none. Both mixture/combination strategies also induced substantial levels of blood-feeding inhibition (38% with combined interventions and 30% with Interceptor? G2 LN). A similar trend of improved mortality of pyrethroid-resistant An. gambiae s.l. from Cove was observed with Interceptor? G2 LN (79%) compared to Interceptor LN (42%, P ConclusionThe use of chlorfenapyr and alpha-cypermethrin together as a mixture on nets (Interceptor? G2 LN) or a combined chlorfenapyr IRS and pyrethroid LN intervention provides improved control of pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors by inducing significantly higher levels of mortality through the chlorfenapyr component and providing personal protection through the pyrethroid component. Both strategies are comparable in their potential to improve the control of malaria transmitted by pyrethroid resistant mosquito vectors.
机译:背景技术当今的疟疾控制受到媒介种群中广泛的杀虫剂耐药性的威胁。世界卫生组织(WHO)建议使用无关的杀虫剂混合物进行室内残留喷洒(IRS)和长效杀虫网(LNs),或将其作为干预措施的组合以改善病媒控制和杀虫剂抗性管理。有必要研究这些不同策略的功效。方法将Interceptor ? G2 LN(一种新开发的用氯非那吡(吡咯)和α-氯氰菊酯(一种拟除虫菊酯)的混合物处理的LN)与氯芬那普IRS和Interceptor 的组合进行比较? LN(标准的α-氯氰菊酯LN)干预贝宁南部小海湾针对野生,自由飞行,耐拟除虫菊酯的冈比亚按蚊的实验小屋还直接与仅使用拟除虫菊酯的网(Interceptor ? LN)和单独的氯芬比尔IRS进行了比较。结果试验期间进行的WHO抗药性生物测定表明,在野生An中拟除虫菊酯抗药频率> 90%。冈比亚有限公司从海湾小屋站点。对照(未经处理的净)小屋的死亡率为5%。接受Interceptor ? LN的死亡率(24%)低于单独使用氯芬那普IRS的死亡率(59%,P? LN和氯芬那普IRS干预和混合净剂量(Interceptor ? G2 LN)的死亡率显着较高(分别为73%和76%),并且两种治疗之间的死亡率均无显着差异(P <=?0.15)。 ,而单独使用氯芬那普的IRS则无法提供任何好处,两种混合/组合策略也都导致了实质性的摄血抑制(联合干预组为38%,Interceptor G2 LN组为30%),类似的改善趋势与Interceptor LN(42%,P)相比,Interceptor ? G2 LN(79%)观察到了来自Cove的拟除虫菊酯抗性冈比亚SL的死亡率。结论使用氯非那吡和α-氯氰菊酯混合使用网状(Interceptor ? G2 LN)或联合氯芬那普IRS和拟除虫菊酯LN i通过通过氯芬那吡成分诱导明显更高的死亡率水平并通过拟除虫菊酯成分提供个人保护,本发明提供了对拟除虫菊酯抗性疟疾载体的更好控制。两种策略在改善对拟除虫菊酯抗性蚊媒传播的疟疾的控制潜力方面具有可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号