...
首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Comparative evaluation of four mosquitoes sampling methods in rice irrigation schemes of lower Moshi, northern Tanzania
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of four mosquitoes sampling methods in rice irrigation schemes of lower Moshi, northern Tanzania

机译:坦桑尼亚北部下莫希稻田灌溉计划中四种蚊虫采样方法的比较评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Adult malaria vector sampling is the most important parameter for setting up an intervention and understanding disease dynamics in malaria endemic areas. The intervention will ideally be species-specific according to sampling output. It was the objective of this study to evaluate four sampling techniques, namely human landing catch, pit shelter, indoor resting collection and odour-baited entry trap. Methodology These four sampling methods were evaluated simultaneously for thirty days during October 2008, a season of low mosquitoes density and malaria transmission. These trapping methods were performed in one village for maximizing homogeneity in mosquito density. The cattle and man used in odour-baited entry trap were rotated between the chambers to avoid bias. Results A total of 3,074 mosquitoes were collected. Among these 1,780 (57.9%) were Anopheles arabiensis and 1,294 (42.1%) were Culex quinquefasciatus. Each trap sampled different number of mosquitoes, Indoor resting collection collected 335 (10.9%), Odour-baited entry trap-cow 1,404 (45.7%), Odour-baited entry trap-human 378 (12.3%), Pit shelter 562 (18.3%) and HLC 395 (12.8%). General linear model univariate analysis method was used, position of the trapping method had no effect on mosquito density catch (DF = 4, F = 35.596, P = 0.78). Days variation had no effect on the collected density too (DF = 29, F = 4.789, P = 0.09). The sampling techniques had significant impact on the caught mosquito densities (DF = 4, F = 34.636, P < 0.0001). The Wilcoxon pair-wise comparison between mosquitoes collected in human landing catch and pit shelter was significant (Z = -3.849, P < 0.0001), human landing catch versus Indoor resting collection was not significant (Z = -0.502, P = 0.615), human landing catch versus odour-baited entry trap-man was significant (Z = -2.687, P = 0.007), human landing catch versus odour-baited entry trap-cow was significant (Z = -3.127, P = 0.002). Conclusion Odour-baited traps with different baits and pit shelter have shown high productivity in collecting higher densities of mosquitoes than human landing catch. These abilities are the possibilities of replacing the human landing catch practices for sampling malaria vectors in areas with An. arabiensis as malaria vectors. Further evaluations of these sampling methods need to be investigated is other areas with different species.
机译:背景成人疟疾媒介取样是在疟疾流行地区建立干预措施和了解疾病动态的最重要参数。理想情况下,根据采样输出,干预将针对特定物种。这项研究的目的是评估四种采样技术,即人为着陆捕获,坑式避难所,室内休息收集和带气味诱饵的进入陷阱。方法学在2008年10月(蚊子密度低和疟疾传播旺季)的30天中,同时评估了这四种采样方法。这些诱捕方法是在一个村庄中执行的,以最大程度地提高蚊子密度的均匀性。在带气味的入口陷阱中使用的牛和人在两个小室之间旋转以避免偏斜。结果共收集蚊子3074只。其中1,780名(57.9%)为阿拉伯按蚊,而1,294名(42.1%)为西库蚊(Culex quinquefasciatus)。每个诱捕器采样了不同数量的蚊子,室内静息收集收集了335个(10.9%),带气味的诱饵进入诱捕牛1,404(45.7%),带气味的诱饵进入诱捕器人类378(12.3%),避难所562(18.3% )和HLC 395(12.8%)。使用一般线性模型单变量分析方法,诱捕方法的位置对蚊子密度的捕获没有影响(DF = 4,F = 35.596,P = 0.78)。天数的变化对收集的密度也没有影响(DF = 29,F = 4.789,P = 0.09)。采样技术对捕获的蚊子密度有重大影响(DF = 4,F = 34.636,P <0.0001)。在人类着陆捕获区和防空洞中收集的蚊子之间的Wilcoxon成对比较显着(Z = -3.849,P <0.0001),人类着陆捕获区与室内静息收集区的蚊子之间无显着差异(Z = -0.502,P = 0.615),人类着陆捕获物与带气味诱饵的进入诱捕者之间的差异显着(Z = -2.687,P = 0.007),人类着陆捕获物与带气味诱饵的进入诱捕者相比是显着的(Z = -3.127,P = 0.002)。结论具有不同诱饵和避难所的诱饵诱集装置在收集蚊子密度方面比人类着陆捕获物具有更高的生产率。这些能力可以代替人类着陆捕获做法,对An地区的疟疾媒介进行抽样。阿拉伯作为疟疾媒介。这些采样方法的进一步评估需要调查其他物种不同的地区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号