首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >A randomized trial on effectiveness of artemether-lumefantrine versus artesunate plus amodiaquine for unsupervised treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Ghanaian children
【24h】

A randomized trial on effectiveness of artemether-lumefantrine versus artesunate plus amodiaquine for unsupervised treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Ghanaian children

机译:蒿甲醚-氟美汀和青蒿琥酯加阿莫地喹治疗加纳儿童单纯性恶性疟原虫疟疾无监督治疗的随机试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Numerous trials have demonstrated high efficacy and safety of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) under supervised treatment. In contrast, effectiveness studies comparing different types of ACT applied unsupervised are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness, tolerability and acceptance of artesunate plus amodiaquine (ASAQ) against that of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) in Ghanaian children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Methods A randomized open-label trial was conducted at two district hospitals in the Ashanti region, Ghana, an area of intense malaria transmission. A total of 246 children under five years of age were randomly assigned to either ASAQ (Arsucam?) or AL (Coartem?). Study participants received their first weight-adjusted dose under supervision. After the parent/guardian was advised of times and mode of administration the respective three-day treatment course was completed unobserved at home. Follow-up visits were performed on days 3, 7, 14 and 28 to evaluate clinical and parasitological outcomes, adverse events, and haematological recovery. Length polymorphisms of variable regions of msp1 and msp2 were determined to differentiate recrudescences from reinfections. Acceptance levels of both treatment regimens were assessed by means of standardized interviews. Results Adequate clinical and parasitological responses after AL and ASAQ treatment were similar (88.3% and 91.7%, respectively). Interestingly, more late clinical failures until day 28 occurred in AL-treated children than in those who received ASAQ (17.5% and 7.3%, respectively; Hazard Ratio 2.41, 95% CI 1.00–5.79, p < 0.05). Haematological recovery and drug tolerability were not found to be significantly different in both study arms. The acceptance of treatment with ASAQ was higher than that with AL (rank-scores 10.6 and 10.3, respectively; p < 0.05). Conclusion Unobserved AL and ASAQ treatment showed high adequate clinical and parasitological responses, though AL was inferior in preventing late clinical failures.
机译:背景技术许多试验已证明在监督治疗下以青蒿素为基础的联合治疗(ACT)具有很高的疗效和安全性。相反,缺乏在无人监督的情况下比较不同类型的ACT的有效性研究。这项研究的目的是比较加纳青蒿素儿童恶性疟原虫疟疾中青蒿琥酯加阿莫地喹(ASAQ)与蒿甲醚-氟美汀(AL)的有效性,耐受性和接受性。方法在加纳阿散蒂地区的两个地方医院进行了一项随机开放标签试验。总共246名五岁以下儿童被随机分配到ASAQ(Arsucam?)或AL(Coartem?)。研究参与者在监督下接受了他们的第一份体重调整剂量。在告知父母/监护人时间和方式后,在家中未观察到的为期三天的治疗过程已经完成。在第3、7、14和28天进行随访,以评估临床和寄生虫学结局,不良事件和血液学恢复。确定了msp1和msp2可变区的长度多态性,以区分再发与再感染。通过标准化访谈评估两种治疗方案的接受程度。结果AL和ASAQ治疗后的充分临床和寄生虫反应相似(分别为88.3%和91.7%)。有趣的是,接受AL治疗的儿童比接受ASAQ的儿童发生的直到28天的晚期临床失败更多(分别为17.5%和7.3%;危险比2.41,95%CI 1.00-5.79,p <0.05)。在两个研究组中,血液学恢复和药物耐受性均未发现显着差异。 ASAQ的治疗接受度高于AL(分别为10.6和10.3; p <0.05)。结论尽管AL在预防晚期临床失败方面较差,但未观察到的AL和ASAQ治疗显示出足够高的临床和寄生虫学反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号