...
首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Efficacy of artesunate–amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine and artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Maradi, Niger
【24h】

Efficacy of artesunate–amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine and artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Maradi, Niger

机译:青蒿琥酯–氨二喹,二氢青蒿素–哌喹和蒿甲醚–萤石碱在尼日尔马拉迪治疗单纯性恶性疟原虫的功效

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundMalaria endemic countries need to assess efficacy of anti-malarial treatments on a regular basis. Moreover, resistance to artemisinin that is established across mainland South-East Asia represents today a major threat to global health. Monitoring the efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapies is of paramount importance to detect as early as possible the emergence of resistance in African countries that toll the highest burden of malaria morbidity and mortality. MethodsA WHO standard protocol was used to assess efficacy of the combinations artesunate–amodiaquine (AS–AQ Winthrop?), dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (DHA–PPQ, Eurartesim?) and artemether–lumefantrine (AM–LM, Coartem?) taken under supervision and respecting pharmaceutical recommendations. The study enrolled for each treatment arm 212 children aged 6–59?months living in Maradi (Niger) and suffering with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. The Kaplan–Meier 42-day PCR-adjusted cure rate was the primary outcome. A standardized parasite clearance estimator was used to assess delayed parasite clearance as surrogate maker of suspected artemisinin resistance. ResultsNo early treatment failures were found in any of the study treatment arms. The day-42 PCR-adjusted cure rate estimates were 99.5, 98.4 and 99.0% in the AS–AQ, DHA–PPQ and AM–LM arms, respectively. The reinfection rate (expressed also as Kaplan–Meier estimates) was higher in the AM–LM arm (32.4%) than in the AS–AQ (13.8%) and the DHA–PPQ arm (24.9%). The parasite clearance rate constant was 0.27, 0.26 and 0.25 per hour for AS–AQ, DHA–PPQ and AM–LM, respectively. ConclusionsAll the three treatments evaluated largely meet WHO criteria (at least 95% efficacy). AS–AQ and AL–LM may continue to be used and DHA–PPQ may be also recommended as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Maradi. The parasite clearance rate were consistent with reference values indicating no suspected artemisinin resistance. Nevertheless, the monitoring of anti-malarial drug efficacy should continue. Trial registration details Registry number at ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01755559
机译:背景疟疾流行国家需要定期评估抗疟疾治疗的功效。此外,东南亚大陆各地建立的对青蒿素的耐药性今天对全球健康构成了重大威胁。监测以青蒿素为基础的联合疗法的有效性至关重要,对于尽早发现非洲国家产生的耐药性是最重要的,这是造成疟疾发病率和死亡率最高的负担。方法采用世界卫生组织标准方案评估青蒿琥酯-氨二喹(AS–AQ Winthrop ?),双氢青蒿素-哌喹(DHA–PPQ,Eurartesim ?)和青蒿琥酯组合的疗效–lumefantrine(AM–LM,Coartem ?)在监督下服用并尊重药物推荐。该研究为每个治疗组招募了212名6月至59个月大的生活在马拉迪(尼日尔)并患有单纯性恶性疟疾的儿童。主要结果是Kaplan–Meier 42天PCR调整的治愈率。使用标准的寄生虫清除率估算器来评估延迟的寄生虫清除率,以此作为怀疑的青蒿素耐药性的替代产生者。结果在任何研究治疗组中均未发现早期治疗失败。在AS-AQ,DHA-PPQ和AM-LM组中,经42天PCR校正后的治愈率估计分别为99.5%,98.4和99.0%。 AM-LM组(32.4%)的再感染率(也表示为Kaplan-Meier估计)高于AS-AQ组(13.8%)和DHA-PPQ组(24.9%)。 AS-AQ,DHA-PPQ和AM-LM的寄生虫清除率常数分别为每小时0.27、0.26和0.25。结论所评估的所有三种治疗方法均基本符合WHO的标准(至少95%的疗效)。可以继续使用AS-AQ和AL-LM,也可以建议将DHA-PPQ用作Maradi单纯性恶性疟疾的一线治疗。寄生虫清除率与参考值一致,表明没有怀疑的青蒿素耐药性。尽管如此,抗疟药功效的监测仍应继续。试验注册详细信息,请访问ClinicalTrial.gov的注册号:NCT01755559

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号