首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Accuracy of a Plasmodium falciparum specific histidine-rich protein 2 rapid diagnostic test in the context of the presence of non-malaria fevers, prior anti-malarial use and seasonal malaria transmission
【24h】

Accuracy of a Plasmodium falciparum specific histidine-rich protein 2 rapid diagnostic test in the context of the presence of non-malaria fevers, prior anti-malarial use and seasonal malaria transmission

机译:在存在非疟疾热,先前抗疟疾使用和季节性疟疾传播的情况下,恶性疟原虫特有的富含组氨酸的蛋白质2快速诊断测试的准确性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundIt remains challenging to distinguish malaria from other fever causing infections, as a positive rapid diagnostic test does not always signify a true active malaria infection. This study was designed to determine the influence of other causes of fever, prior anti-malarial treatment, and a possible seasonality of the performance of a Pf HRP2 RDT for the diagnosis of malaria in children under-5?years of age living in a malaria endemic area. MethodsA prospective etiology study was conducted in 2015 among febrile children under 5?years of age in Burkina Faso. In order to assess the influence of other febrile illnesses, prior treatment and seasonality on the performance of a Pf HRP2 RDT in diagnosing malaria, the RDT results were compared with the gold standard (expert microscopic diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum ) and test results were analysed by assuming that prior anti-malarial use and bacterial/viral infection status would have been known prior to testing. To assess bacterial and viral infection status blood, urine and stool samples were analysed. ResultsIn total 683 blood samples were analysed with microscopy and RDT- Pf HRP2. Plasmodium falciparum malaria was diagnosed in 49.8% (340/683) by microscopy compared to 69.5% (475/683) by RDT- Pf HRP2. The RDT- Pf HRP2 reported 29.7% (141/475) false positive results and 1.8% (6/340) false negative cases. The RDT- Pf HRP2 had a high sensitivity (98.2%) and negative predictive value (97.1%), but a low specificity (58.9%) and positive predictive value (70.3%). Almost 50% of the alternative cause of fever were diagnosed by laboratory testing in the RDT false positive malaria group. ConclusionsThe use of a malaria RDT- Pf HRP2 in a malaria endemic area may cause misdiagnosis of the actual cause of fever due to false positive test results. The development of a practical diagnostic tool to screen for other causes of fever in malaria endemic areas is required to save lives.
机译:背景技术将疟疾与其他发烧引起的感染区分开来仍然是一项挑战,因为快速诊断测试并不总是意味着真正的主动性疟疾感染。本研究旨在确定其他发热原因,先前的抗疟疾治疗以及Pf HRP2 RDT表现可能季节性的影响,以诊断生活在疟疾中的5岁以下儿童中的疟疾。流行地区。方法于2015年在布基纳法索对5岁以下的高热儿童进行了一项前瞻性病因学研究。为了评估其他发热性疾病,先前的治疗和季节性因素对Pf HRP2 RDT诊断疟疾的性能的影响,将RDT结果与金标准(恶性疟原虫的专业显微镜诊断)进行了比较,并通过假设在测试之前就已经知道先前的抗疟药使用和细菌/病毒感染状态。为了评估细菌和病毒感染状况,对血液,尿液和粪便样本进行了分析。结果用显微镜和RDT-Pf HRP2分析了总共683份血液样本。显微镜检查诊断为恶性疟原虫疟疾的比例为49.8%(340/683),而RDT-Pf HRP2诊断为69.5%(475/683)。 RDT-Pf HRP2报告假阳性结果为29.7%(141/475),假阴性结果为1.8%(6/340)。 RDT-Pf HRP2具有高灵敏度(98.2%)和阴性预测值(97.1%),但特异性低(58.9%)和阳性预测值(70.3%)。在RDT假阳性疟疾组中,通过实验室测试诊断出将近50%的替代性发烧原因。结论在疟疾流行地区使用疟疾RDT-Pf HRP2可能会由于假阳性测试结果而导致对发烧实际原因的误诊。为了挽救生命,需要开发一种实用的诊断工具来筛查疟疾流行​​地区的其他发烧原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号