首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Post-marketing assessment of content and efficacy of preservatives in artemisinin-derived antimalarial dry suspensions for paediatric use
【24h】

Post-marketing assessment of content and efficacy of preservatives in artemisinin-derived antimalarial dry suspensions for paediatric use

机译:上市后评估青蒿素来源的儿科用抗疟疾干混悬液中防腐剂的含量和功效

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Artemisinin-derivative formulations are now widely used to treat falciparum malaria. However, the dry powder suspensions developed for children are few and/or are of poor quality. In addition to the active compound, the presence of a suitable preservative in these medicines is essential. In this study, an evaluation of the preservative content and efficacy in some dry suspensions available on the Kenyan market was performed. Method UV spectrophotometry was used to identify the preservatives in each sample while HPLC-UV was used for quantification. After reconstitution of the powders in water, the dissolution of the preservatives was followed for 7 days. Antimicrobial efficacy of the preservatives was assessed by conducting a preservative efficacy test (PET) following the European pharmacopoeia standards. Results Four different preservatives were identified namely methylparahydroxybenzoate (MP), propylparahydroxybenzoate (PP), benzoic acid and sorbic acid. MP and PP were identified in Artesiane? (artemether 300 mg/100 ml), Alaxin? (dihydroartemisinin 160 mg/80 ml) andGvither ? (artemether 300 mg/100 ml) respectively. Sorbic acid was presentin Artenam? (artemether 180 mg/60 ml) while benzoic acid was identified in Santecxin? (dihydroartemisinin 160 mg/80 ml) andArtexin? (dihydroartemisinin 160 mg/80 ml) respectively. Cotecxin? (dihydroartemisinin 160 mg/80 ml) did not contain any of the above preservatives. After reconstitution in water, preservativesin 50%(3/6) of the products did not completely dissolve and the PET results revealed that only Artenam? and Gvither? met the requirements for antimicrobial efficacy. The other products did not conform. Conclusion These results show that paediatric antimalarial dry powder formulations on the market may contain ineffective or incorrect amounts of preservatives. This is a potential risk to the patient. Studies conducted on the dry powder suspensions should include the analysis of both the active ingredient and the preservative, including the efficacy of the latter.
机译:背景技术青蒿素衍生物现已被广泛用于治疗恶性疟疾。但是,为儿童开发的干粉悬浮液很少和/或质量较差。除活性化合物外,这些药物中必须存在合适的防腐剂。在这项研究中,对肯尼亚市场上一些干混悬液中的防腐剂含量和功效进行了评估。方法采用紫外分光光度法鉴定每个样品中的防腐剂,而采用HPLC-UV定量。粉末在水中重构后,将防腐剂溶解7天。通过遵循欧洲药典标准进行防腐功效测试(PET)来评估防腐剂的抗菌功效。结果鉴定出四种不同的防腐剂,分别是对羟基苯甲酸甲酯(MP),对羟基苯甲酸丙酯(PP),苯甲酸和山梨酸。 MP和PP在Artesiane中被确定? (蒿甲醚300毫克/ 100毫升),Alaxin? (二氢青蒿素160 mg / 80 ml)和(蒿甲醚300 mg / 100 ml)分别。山梨酸中存在山梨酸吗? (蒿甲醚180 mg / 60 ml),而在Santecxin中鉴定出了苯甲酸? (二氢青蒿素160 mg / 80 ml)和Artexin? (二氢青蒿素160 mg / 80 ml)。 Cotecxin? (二氢青蒿素160 mg / 80 ml)不包含任何上述防腐剂。在水中复溶后,50%(3/6)产品中的防腐剂没有完全溶解,PET结果显示只有Artenam?和吉维瑟?符合抗菌功效的要求。其他产品不符合。结论这些结果表明,市场上的儿科抗疟疾干粉制剂可能含有无效或不正确量的防腐剂。这对患者是潜在的风险。对干粉悬浮液进行的研究应包括对活性成分和防腐剂的分析,包括后者的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号