首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Is there a distinction between malaria treatment and intermittent preventive treatment? Insights from a cross-sectional study of anti-malarial drug use among Ugandan pregnant women
【24h】

Is there a distinction between malaria treatment and intermittent preventive treatment? Insights from a cross-sectional study of anti-malarial drug use among Ugandan pregnant women

机译:疟疾治疗和间歇性预防治疗之间有区别吗?乌干达孕妇抗疟药物使用横断面研究的见解

获取原文
       

摘要

Background In Uganda, treatment of clinical malaria and intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) are common during pregnancy. As a result, both formal and informal reports from antenatal sources suggest possible misuse of SP for malaria treatment among pregnant women. The objective of this study was to investigate anti-malarial drug use patterns among women who had recently suffered malaria illness before and during pregnancy. Methods A cross-sectional study in which a structured questionnaire (interviewer-administered) was used to collect data from pregnant women attending an urban antenatal clinic. Details of medicines used to treat malaria episodes suffered before and during pregnancy were captured. A first order Markov probability model was used to estimate probabilities of transitioning between treatment choices made before and during pregnancy. Logistic regression was used to explore whether demographic and obstetric characteristics were associated with transition patterns. Results Seven hundred women were interviewed among whom 428 had suffered malaria in both instances. Three hundred thirty of these could recall the medicines used in both instances. Women who used ACT/QNN (correct choice) before pregnancy had higher probabilities of transitioning to SP than staying on ACT/QNN during pregnancy (0.463 versus 0.451). Access of medicines from private outlets (clinics and pharmacies) were more than nine times predictive of receiving correct medicines (p=0.035 and p=0.039 respectively). Access of medicines from clinics was 5.9 times protective against receiving SP for malaria treatment (p=0.033). Among those who used SP before pregnancy, there was a 0.75 probability of staying on it during pregnancy. None of the factors explored could explain this observation. Conclusion Use of SP for malaria treatment is common during pregnancy. This may be contributing to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Antenatal care providers should endeavour to emphasize the distinction between treatment and prevention of malaria during pregnancy.
机译:背景技术在乌干达,怀孕期间常见临床疾病的治疗和磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(SP)的间歇性预防治疗。结果,产前来源的正式和非正式报告都表明,孕妇可能滥用SP进行疟疾治疗。这项研究的目的是调查在怀孕之前和怀孕期间最近患有疟疾的女性中的抗疟疾药物使用方式。方法采用横断面研究方法,其中使用结构化问卷(由访调员管理)收集来自城市产前诊所就诊孕妇的数据。记录了用于治疗怀孕前后疟疾的药物的详细信息。一阶马尔可夫概率模型用于估计在怀孕之前和怀孕期间做出的治疗选择之间转换的概率。 Logistic回归用于探讨人口统计学和产科特征是否与过渡方式相关。结果采访了700名妇女,其中428名患有疟疾。其中的330个可以召回两种情况下使用的药物。怀孕前使用ACT / QNN(正确选择)的女性比怀孕期间坚持ACT / QNN的女性有更高的可能性转为SP(0.463对0.451)。从私人商店(诊所和药房)获取药物的预测是正确药物接受的九倍以上(分别为p = 0.035和p = 0.039)。从诊所获得的药物是接受SP治疗疟疾的保护的5.9倍(p = 0.033)。在怀孕前使用SP的人中,怀孕期间使用SP的可能性为0.75。探索的因素都不能解释这一发现。结论在怀孕期间,通常使用SP来治疗疟疾。这可能会导致不良的妊娠结局。产前护理人员应努力强调妊娠期间疟疾的治疗与预防之间的区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号