...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Surgery >High-grade Gliomas Exhibit Higher Peritumoral Fractional Anisotropy and Lower Mean Diffusivity than Intracranial Metastases
【24h】

High-grade Gliomas Exhibit Higher Peritumoral Fractional Anisotropy and Lower Mean Diffusivity than Intracranial Metastases

机译:与颅内转移瘤相比,高级别胶质瘤表现出更高的周界分数各向异性和更低的平均扩散率

获取原文
           

摘要

Differentiating high-grade gliomas and intracranial metastases through non-invasive imaging has been challenging. Here, we retrospectively compared both intratumoral and peritumoral fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) measurements between high-grade gliomas and metastases. Two methods were utilized to select peritumoral region of interest (ROI). The first method utilized the manual placement of four ROIs adjacent to the lesion. The second method utilized a semiautomated and proprietary MATLAB script to generate an ROI encompassing the entire tumor. The average peritumoral FA, MD, and FLAIR values were determined within the ROIs for both methods. Forty patients with high-grade gliomas and 44 with metastases were enrolled in this study. Thirty-five patients with high-grade glioma and 30 patients with metastases had FLAIR images. There was no significant difference in age, gender, or race between the two patient groups. The high-grade gliomas had a significantly higher tumor-to-brain area ratio compared to the metastases. There were no differences in average intratumoral FA, MD, and FLAIR values between the two groups. Both the manual sample method and the semiautomated peritumoral ring method resulted in significantly higher peritumoral FA and significantly lower peritumoral MD in high-grade gliomas compared to metastases (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in FLAIR values between the two groups peritumorally. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed FA to be a more sensitive and specific metric to differentiate high-grade gliomas and metastases than MD. The differences in the peritumoral FA and MD values between high-grade gliomas and metastases seemed due to the infiltration of glioma to the surrounding brain parenchyma.
机译:通过非侵入性成像区分高级别神经胶质瘤和颅内转移瘤已经成为一项挑战。在这里,我们回顾性比较了高级神经胶质瘤和转移瘤之间的肿瘤内和肿瘤内分数各向异性(FA),平均扩散率(MD)和液体衰减倒置恢复(FLAIR)测量。利用两种方法选择感兴趣的肿瘤周围区域(ROI)。第一种方法是在病变附近手动放置四个ROI。第二种方法利用半自动化的专有MATLAB脚本生成涵盖整个肿瘤的ROI。两种方法均在ROI内确定了平均瘤周FA,MD和FLAIR值。这项研究招募了40例高级别神经胶质瘤患者和44例转移瘤。 35例高级别胶质瘤患者和30例转移瘤患者均具有FLAIR图像。两组患者的年龄,性别或种族没有显着差异。与转移相比,高级神经胶质瘤的肿瘤与脑的面积比明显更高。两组之间的平均瘤内FA,MD和FLAIR值无差异。与转移相比,在高级别神经胶质瘤中,手工取样法和半自动肿瘤周围环法均导致肿瘤周围FA显着升高和肿瘤MD显着降低(p <0.05)。两组的FLAIR值在周向上均无显着差异。受体工作曲线分析显示,FA是比MD更敏感,更具体的指标,可用于区分高级别胶质瘤和转移灶。高度脑胶质瘤和转移瘤之间的肿瘤周围FA和MD值的差异似乎是由于脑胶质瘤浸润到周围的脑实质中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号