首页> 外文期刊>Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts: Section of Biological and Medical Sciences >THE POTENTIAL OF FLUORIDE-RELEASING DENTAL RESTORATIVES TO INHIBIT ENAMEL DEMINERALIZATION: AN SEM STUDY
【24h】

THE POTENTIAL OF FLUORIDE-RELEASING DENTAL RESTORATIVES TO INHIBIT ENAMEL DEMINERALIZATION: AN SEM STUDY

机译:消除氟化物的牙齿修复物抑制牙釉质半脱矿化的潜力:SEM研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: The study was aimed at determining the effectiveness of fluoride-releasing materials (conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomers, com-pomer and fluoride-releasing composite resin) in inhibiting demineralization of restored teeth in an artificial caries medium. Methods: A total of 72 teeth (36 deciduous and 36 permanent) were used and Class V cavities were prepared on each tooth. These cavities were restored with or without conditioning (except for the composite, where all specimens were conditioned). The teeth were then stored in artificial saliva for periods of 1, 6, 12 and 18 months before being exposed to an acidic artificial caries gel and examined by SEM. Results: In the absence of a restoration, teeth were found to undergo enamel demineralization. Conventional glass-ionomer cements were found to inhibit this sig-nificantly. The resin-modified glass-ionomer generally had little effect, except for the18 month specimens, which also showed distinct zones of inhibition. The compomer showed no inhibition, and the fluoride-releasing composite resin showed only limited signsof inhibition.Conclusions: Glass-ionomers, both conventional or resin-modified, are more effective at protecting the tooth against further decay than either compomers or fluo-ride-releasing composites, with the best protection of all being provided by con-ventional glass-ionomers. The nature of the tooth had no influence on these outcomes
机译:目的:该研究旨在确定氟化物释放材料(传统的和树脂改性的玻璃离聚物,复合材料和氟化物释放的复合树脂)在人造龋齿介质中抑制修复牙齿脱矿质的有效性。方法:共使用72颗牙齿(36颗乳牙和36颗恒牙),并在每颗牙齿上准备V级腔。这些空腔可在有条件或无条件的条件下恢复(复合材料除外,其中所有标本均已条件化)。然后在暴露于酸性人造龋齿凝胶并通过SEM检查之前,将牙齿在人造唾液中保存1、6、12和18个月。结果:在没有修复的情况下,发现牙齿进行了牙釉质脱矿质。发现常规的玻璃离聚物水泥明显地抑制了这种情况。树脂改性的玻璃离聚物通常没有什么影响,除了18个月的样品外,还显示出明显的抑制区域。该复合物没有显示出抑制作用,而释放氟化物的复合树脂仅显示了有限的抑制作用。结论:常规或树脂改性的玻璃离聚物比复合物或氟化物更有效地防止牙齿进一步腐烂。释放复合材料,而常规玻璃离聚物则能提供最好的保护。牙齿的性质对这些结果没有影响

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号