...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology Research >Novel Surgical Treatments for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Systematic Review of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation and Electric Stimulation Therapy
【24h】

Novel Surgical Treatments for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Systematic Review of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation and Electric Stimulation Therapy

机译:胃食管反流疾病的新型外科治疗:电磁括约肌增强和电刺激疗法的系统评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Electric stimulation therapy (EST) and magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) represent novel methods for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of EST and magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSAD) comapred to laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) and proton pump inhibitor therapy (in case of EST). We performed a systematic literature search without restrictions on publication dates in five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, PubMed, and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination), complemented by hand search, search in trial registries, and documentation provided by the manufacturers. No study passed inclusion criteria for analyzing EST effectiveness. Concerning safety, lead erosion through the esophagus and trocar perforation of the small bowel occurred in 2.4% of patients (in one study). Only the registry study fulfilled inclusion criteria for effectiveness analysis of MSAD. The crucial outcome of GERD-health-related quality of life (HRQL) score improved from 20 to 3 points in MSAD patients, and from 23 to 3.5 points in LF patients. However, the LF patients were in a more severe stage of the disease. The results yield indefinite conclusions about the use of both MSAD and EST. Clinical effectiveness and safety of both MSAD and EST are not sufficiently proven and are yet to be supported by high quality evidence from randomized controlled trials.Gastroenterol Res. 2018;11(3):161-173doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1024w.
机译:电刺激疗法(EST)和电磁括约肌增强(MSA)代表了外科治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的新方法。这篇综述的目的是评估EST和与腹腔镜胃底折叠术(LF)和质子泵抑制剂治疗(在EST情况下)配套的电磁括约肌增强装置(MSAD)的有效性和安全性。我们对五个电子数据库(MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆,PubMed和评论与传播中心)中的出版日期进行了系统的文献检索,没有任何限制,此外,我们还进行了手工检索,在试验注册中心进行检索以及制造商提供的文档, 。没有研究通过纳入标准来分析EST有效性。关于安全性,在2.4%的患者中发生了通过食道的铅侵蚀和小肠的套管针穿孔(在一项研究中)。只有注册研究符合MSAD有效性分析的纳入标准。 GERD健康相关生活质量(HRQL)评分的关键结果在MSAD患者中从20分提高到3分,在LF患者中从23分提高到3.5分。然而,LF患者处于疾病的更严重阶段。结果得出有关同时使用MSAD和EST的不确定结论。 MSAD和EST的临床有效性和安全性尚未得到充分证明,并且尚有来自随机对照试验的高质量证据支持。 2018; 11(3):161-173doi:https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1024w。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号