首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology Report >Effective teaching of endoscopy: a qualitative study of the perceptions of gastroenterology fellows and attending gastroenterologists
【24h】

Effective teaching of endoscopy: a qualitative study of the perceptions of gastroenterology fellows and attending gastroenterologists

机译:内窥镜的有效教学:对肠胃科医师和就诊肠胃科医师的看法的定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: There is little information describing the perceptions of gastroenterology fellows and attending gastroenterologists of what constitutes effective teaching of endoscopy. We sought to identify common themes regarding endoscopy training methods and their impact among fellows and attendings. Methods: Focus group exercises and surveys were conducted among fellows, about educational resources, teaching techniques and ways of improving the teaching of endoscopy. The fellows identified the ‘best' teachers of endoscopy, who were interviewed regarding their training in endoscopy, their teaching methods, key points of information, and opinions on endoscopy curriculum. Results: Nineteen fellows (68%) had attended the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy First Year Fellows' Endoscopy course and found it very helpful. Thirteen fellows(46%) had exposure to an endoscopy simulator, but their median duration of use was only 1?hour. Only two out of five fellowship programs used a formal endoscopic skill assessment tool and none of the programs had an endoscopy curriculum of which the fellows were aware. Fellows reported that they learned endoscopy best by performing procedures. They also volunteered that attending gastroenterologists used variable teaching methods, and might benefit from instruction on how to teach endoscopy. Ten attending gastroenterologists (77%) had received training in advanced procedures; none received formal training on teaching endoscopy: they all felt that such training would be beneficial. Conclusions: A standardized endoscopy curriculum may be beneficial to fellows, who prefer to learn endoscopy by performing procedures—but they want explicit and specific instruction. Both those attending and the fellows thought that formal instruction for attending gastroenterologists on how to teach endoscopy would be beneficial, indicating a role for a ‘teach-the-teacher' curriculum.
机译:背景:很少有信息描述肠胃病学同仁以及肠胃病学专家对什么构成内窥镜有效教学的看法。我们试图确定有关内窥镜检查培训方法及其对同伴和参加者的影响的共同主题。方法:在同伴之间进行焦点小组练习和调查,以了解教育资源,教学技术和改善内窥镜检查教学方法的方法。研究员确定了“内镜”的“最佳”老师,他们接受了有关内镜的培训,他们的教学方法,信息要点和对内镜课程的看法的访谈。结果:19位研究人员(68%)参加了美国胃肠道内窥镜检查学会第一年研究员的内窥镜检查课程,并发现这非常有帮助。 13名研究人员(46%)曾接受过内窥镜模拟器的暴露,但他们的平均使用时间仅为1小时。五个研究金计划中只有两个使用正式的内窥镜技能评估工具,并且没有一个计划的研究者知道内窥镜课程。研究员报告说,他们通过执行程序最了解内窥镜检查。他们还自愿要求就诊的肠胃病医生使用可变的教学方法,并且可能会从有关内窥镜检查的教学中受益。十名主治肠胃科医生(77%)接受了高级程序培训;没有人接受过关于内窥镜检查教学的正式培训:他们都认为这样的培训将是有益的。结论:标准化的内窥镜课程可能对那些喜欢通过执行程序学习内窥镜的同伴有益,但他们需要明确而具体的指导。参加会议的人和与会人员均认为,向肠胃病学医师教授内窥镜检查的正式指导将是有益的,这表明了“教师教学”课程的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号