...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Marine Science >Comparison of Rapid Biodiversity Assessment of Meiobenthos Using MALDI-TOF MS and Metabarcoding
【24h】

Comparison of Rapid Biodiversity Assessment of Meiobenthos Using MALDI-TOF MS and Metabarcoding

机译:MALDI-TOF MS和元条形码技术快速评估淡水豚鱼的生物多样性

获取原文

摘要

Nowadays, most biodiversity assessments involving meiofauna are mainly carried out specimen by specimen based on morphological identifications, which is very time-consuming and demands comprehensive taxonomic knowledge. Specimens have to be examined for minor differences of setae compositions, mouthpart morphology or number of segments for various extremities. DNA-based methods such as metabarcoding as well as recently emerged rapid analyses using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to identify specimens based on a proteome fingerprint could vastly accelerate the process of specimen identification in biodiversity assessments. However, these techniques depend on reference libraries to connect assessed data to morphologically described species. In this study the success rate of both approaches have been tested based on reference libraries constructed using part of the samples from a new study area to identify unknown samples. Using MALDI-TOF MS we found, that species not contained in an incomplete mass spectra reference library only have minor impact on the results, when employing a post hoc test for Random Forest classifications. This test reveals specimens that demand morphological re-examination for the final species assignment. Metabarcoding however strongly demands a rich reference library to provide correct MOTU assessments in congruence with morphological determination. Nevertheless, with a complete library and a suitable data transformation (herein log(x+1)), the number or reads per MOTU reflects relative species abundances in metabarcoding inference. Furthermore, a single gene barcoding approach on selected specimens was performed here in order to provide a cost comparison among the three techniques. The results of this study facilitate specimen identification by using MALDI-TOF MS, which is incomparably cheap for specimen-by-specimen identification, but when it comes to sample wise analyses, metabarcoding outperforms other techniques by far.
机译:如今,大多数涉及淡水动植物的生物多样性评估主要是基于形态学鉴定逐个标本进行的,这非常耗时,并且需要全面的分类学知识。必须检查标本中不同末端的刚毛成分,口部形态或节段数量的细微差异。基于DNA的方法(例如元条形码)以及最近出现的使用MALDI-TOF质谱进行快速分析以基于蛋白质组指纹识别样品的方法,可以极大地加快生物多样性评估中样品鉴定的过程。但是,这些技术依靠参考库将评估的数据与形态描述的物种联系起来。在这项研究中,已经基于参考库测试了这两种方法的成功率,这些参考库使用来自新研究区域的部分样本来识别未知样本。当使用事后检验进行随机森林分类时,使用MALDI-TOF MS,我们发现,不完整的质谱参考库中未包含的物种对结果的影响很小。该测试揭示了需要对最终物种进行形态重新检查的标本。然而,元条形码强烈要求丰富的参考库,以提供与形态学确定一致的正确MOTU评估。但是,借助完整的库和适当的数据转换(在此为log(x + 1)),每个MOTU的读取次数或数量反映了元条形码推论中的相对物种丰富度。此外,此处对选定的标本执行了单基因条形码方法,以提供三种技术之间的成本比较。这项研究的结果有助于通过使用MALDI-TOF MS进行标本鉴定,这对于逐标本鉴定而言是无比便宜的,但是在进行样本明智的分析时,元条形码远远优于其他技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号