首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology Report >Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies
【24h】

Specimen retrieval approaches in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections: a literature-based review of published studies

机译:腹腔镜结直肠切除术患者的标本检索方法:已发表研究的文献综述

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To review the published studies reporting various specimen retrieval incisions being used by colorectal surgeons in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections (LCR). Methods: Standard medical electronic databases were searched to find relevant articles and a summary conclusion was generated. Results: There were 43 studies reporting various approaches used for the purpose of specimen retrieval in 2388 patients undergoing LCR. The most common approaches were periumbilical midline incision (1260 reported case in the literature), transverse incision (583 reported cases in the literature) in the right- or left iliac fossa, depending on the side of colonic resection, and Pfannensteil incision (293 reported cases in the literature). Periumbilical midline incision was associated with the higher risk of developing incisional hernia (odds ratio 53.72; 95% confidence interval 7.48–386.04; Z = 3.96; P = 0.0001). In terms of surgical site infection (SSI), there was no difference between the three common approaches to specimen retrieval. Transanal and transvaginal approaches were associated with higher risk of SSI. Conclusions: Midline, transverse and Pfannensteil incisions were the most commonly used approaches for specimen retrieval following LCR. Midline incision was associated with higher risk of incisional hernia. Risk of SSI was similar in all three common approaches. The transanal and transvaginal approaches pose a higher risk of SSI. These conclusions are based on the combined outcome of published case series, case reports and comparative studies. Randomized, controlled trials with longer follow-up are required before recommending the routine use of any approach for specimen retrieval in patients undergoing LCR.
机译:目的:回顾已发表的研究报告,这些研究报告了结直肠外科医师在接受腹腔镜结直肠切除术(LCR)的患者中使用的各种标本取回切口。方法:检索标准医学电子数据库以查找相关文章,并得出总结结论。结果:有43项研究报告了2388例接受LCR的患者采用了各种方法来取回标本。最常见的方法是根据结肠切除的侧面,在胆囊中线上切开胆囊中线切口(文献报道1260例),在右或左s窝进行横切口(文献报道583例),并进行Pfannensteil切口(报道293例)。文献中的案例)。脐带中线切口与切入疝的高发风险相关(奇数比53.72; 95%置信区间7.48–386.04; Z = 3.96; P = 0.0001)。就手术部位感染(SSI)而言,三种常见的标本取回方法之间没有差异。经肛门和经阴道入路与更高的SSI风险相关。结论:中线,横向和翼状P肉切口是LCR术后最常用的标本取回方法。中线切口与切开疝的风险较高有关。在所有三种常见方法中,SSI的风险均相似。经肛门和经阴道的方法引起SSI的风险较高。这些结论基于已发表的病例系列,病例报告和比较研究的综合结果。在建议常规使用任何方法对接受LCR的患者进行标本检索之前,需要进行长期随访的随机对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号