首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >An Original Approach to Evaluating the Quality of Blood Donor Selection: Checking Donor Questionnaires and Analyzing Donor Deferral Rate
【24h】

An Original Approach to Evaluating the Quality of Blood Donor Selection: Checking Donor Questionnaires and Analyzing Donor Deferral Rate

机译:评估献血者选择质量的原始方法:检查献血者问卷和分析献血者递延率

获取原文
           

摘要

Blood donor selection is a cornerstone for blood transfusion safety, designed to safeguard the health of both donors and recipients. In the Service du Sang, Belgian Red Cross, French and German-speaking part of Belgium (SFS), health professionals (HPs) are allowed to interview donors on their own after formal qualification. This qualification is afterward evaluated by means of two complementary quality indicators: monitoring of donor health questionnaires (DHQs) and analysis of donor deferral rate. The study aims to evaluate the degree to which both quality indicators may be useful and appropriate tools to evaluate the quality of blood donor selection. An analysis performed on 2016 data showed that noncompliance detected by means of DHQ monitoring seems to be more frequent in HPs who conduct a low number of interviews compared to all HPs as a group (5.67 vs. 3.23%; p < 0.001). Deferral rates are also higher in HPs with a lower activity compared to HPs who interview more donors (14.80 vs. 13.00%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, statistically differences are observed between the type of blood donation venue in terms of the global deferral rate (for instance fixed site vs. schools: 11.9 vs. 19.5%; p < 0.001), and specific reasons for deferral (such as sexual risk behavior and travel in at-risk areas, the differences being highly significant between each category of blood donation venue; p < 0.001). Providing the HPs with feedback on these findings was an opportunity to draw their attention to some aspects of the selection process in order to improve it.
机译:献血者的选择是输血安全的基石,旨在保护献血者和接受者的健康。在比利时红十字会,比利时的法语和德语区(SFS)的Du Sang服务中心,卫生专业人员(HPs)在获得正式资格后,可以自行采访捐助者。随后,通过两个互补的质量指标来评估该资格:监测捐赠者健康调查表(DHQ)和分析捐赠者递延率。该研究旨在评估两种质量指标可能有用的程度以及评估献血者选择质量的适当工具。根据2016年的数据进行的分析显示,与所有HP人群相比,通过DHQ监测检测到的不合规性在接受低访谈次数的HP人群中更为常见(5.67 vs.3.23%; p <0.001)。与采访更多捐赠者的HP相比,活动量较低的HP的延期率也更高(14.80比13.00%,p <0.001)。此外,从全球递延率(例如固定地点与学校:11.9 vs. 19.5%; p <0.001)和特定的延期原因(例如性风险)方面,在献血场所的类型之间存在统计学差异。高危地区的行为和旅行,每种类型的献血场所之间的差异都非常显着; p <0.001)。向惠普提供有关这些发现的反馈意见是一个机会,可以提请他们注意选择过程的某些方面,以改进选择过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号