首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Communication >Vocabulary Gains of Mono- and Multilingual Learners in a Linguistically Diverse Setting: Results From a German-English Intervention With Inclusion of Home Languages
【24h】

Vocabulary Gains of Mono- and Multilingual Learners in a Linguistically Diverse Setting: Results From a German-English Intervention With Inclusion of Home Languages

机译:语言多样的环境中单语和多语学习者的词汇量增长:德语-英语干预(包括母语)的结果

获取原文
       

摘要

Today, group settings (e.g., in kindergarten) are more linguistically-diverse than ever. However, concepts in language acquisition only rarely include this fact. This paper reports on the effects of a language intervention which is based on a concept specifically designed for linguistically-diverse settings (a??PROgramme for BI- and MUltilingual Childrena??; Festman and Rinker, 2014). The implementation of the programme and its outcomes are described with the example of a German-English-immersion kindergarten, which was in fact plurilingual. We aimed at supporting childrena??s acquisition of the two languages in parallel with inclusion of their home languages. Overall, 52 (mono-, bi-, and trilingual) children took part in the intervention, although data will only be presented for those children (n = 22; 12 male; mean age 3;9 years, SD 0.526) who also participated in the evaluation. Two weeks before (T1) and 12 weeks after (T2) intense intervention, we administered a word production and word comprehension test (picture naming) both in German and English. Furthermore, parents filled out a questionnaire on language background and use; after the intervention, they provided feedback on the programme (their impressions and observations, etc.). Paired t-tests showed that the intervention noticeably boosted all childrena??s word learning (all gains from T1 to T2 were significant with p .001 for both languages and both production and comprehension). With a head start in German (i.e., at T1 significantly higher scores in German comprehension and production), the monolingual German participants (n = 11) reached significantly higher scores in German as well as at T2 compared to their peers. The international group (n = 11) had significantly larger gains in German than their monolingual peers (p =.037 for production; p =.015 for comprehension), but not in English. We conclude that with the help of this structured programme and due to plurilingual experiences, minority children were able to improve language skills in two newly-learned languages, whereas the monolingual children were still consolidating knowledge in their first language and focused on the acquisition of the new language. Parentsa?? responses described the positive impact of the programme on their childrena??s language learning interest and their own.
机译:如今,小组设置(例如在幼儿园)比以往任何时候都在语言上更加多样化。但是,语言习得中的概念很少包含这一事实。本文报告了语言干预的效果,该干预基于专门为语言多样化设置而设计的概念(BI和多语言儿童的PROGRAME程序; Festman和Rinker,2014年)。该计划的实施及其成果以德国英语浸入式幼儿园为例进行了描述,该幼儿园实际上是多语言的。我们旨在支持childa ??并同时收录其母语的两种语言。总体上,有52名(单,双,三语)儿童参加了干预,尽管仅提供了也参加的那些儿童(n = 22; 12名男性;平均年龄3; 9岁,SD 0.526)的数据。在评估中。在(T1)的前两周和(T2)的后十二周,我们分别用德语和英语进行了单词产生和单词理解测试(图片命名)。此外,父母还填写了关于语言背景和使用情况的调查表;干预后,他们提供了有关该计划的反馈(他们的印象和观察结果等)。配对的t检验表明,干预显着地提高了所有孩子的单词学习能力(从T1到T2的所有收益都显着,对于两种语言以及生产能力和理解力均p <0.001)。在德语方面取得领先优势(即在T1时,德国人的理解和生产得分要高得多),单语德语参与者(n = 11)与同龄人相比,德语和T2得分都高得多。国际组织(n = 11)在德语方面的收益明显高于单语种(在生产方面为p = .037;在理解方面为p = .015),但在英语方面则没有。我们的结论是,借助这一结构化计划并由于具有丰富的语言经验,少数民族儿童能够提高两种新学习语言的语言技能,而单语儿童仍在巩固其母语的知识,并专注于获得新语言。父母??回答描述了该计划对孩子的语言学习兴趣和他们自己的积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号